SAT-816 Why Is There Medical Resistance to Do Sexual History?

Abstract Disclosure: C. Dominguez-Bali: None. E.S. Tsehaye: None. E. Johnson: None. H.A. Goraya: None. W.K. Massah: None. K. McCoy: None. M.A. Bencomo: None. R. Polam: None. M.A. Syed: None. A. Dominguez-Bali: None. Science and medicine have historically been shaped by religion, culture, politics, and financial interests, often resulting in the denial or neglect of human sexuality as a fundamental aspect of health. Despite the widespread occurrence of sexual dysfunctions and associated social and medical challenges—such as unplanned pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), fertility issues, and mental health crises—formal education in human sexuality remains limited across various fields, including medicine, psychology, and sociology. Medical training programs, particularly in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urology, Family Medicine and Endocrinology offer minimal preparation in sexual histories. Barriers to improvement include lack of training and discomfort with discussing sexual topics, rooted in inadequate sexual education for the people in general but also for the medical schools and residency programs. This study advocates the routine implementation of sexual history-taking in clinical practice by examining existing literature and data from our medical centers. A comprehensive review was conducted, encompassing both medical and sexological literature, supported by data collected from two medical centers.The findings from the literature review and our clinical experience provide statistical support and compelling arguments for integrating sexual history into routine practice, highlighting the potential for improved diagnosis and treatment outcomes. By adopting sexual history-taking as a standard practice in clinical settings, healthcare providers can effectively address a wide range of diagnosable and treatable issues (more than 25 diagnosis rarely found in the regular medical practice), ultimately enhancing the health and well-being of the community. Furthermore, increasing the emphasis on sexual health within medical education and training could lead to significant advancements in patient care. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.1304
Primary Topic
Medical History and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SAT-816 Why Is There Medical Resistance to Do Sexual History?

M.A. Syed, Krista A. McCoy, Erin Johnson, Alberto Dominguez-Bali et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Medical History and Research
article

SAT-816 Why Is There Medical Resistance to Do Sexual History?

M.A. Syed, Krista A. McCoy, Erin Johnson, Alberto Dominguez-Bali, Catherine Dominguez-Bali, Eseyes Semere Tsehaye, Hira A Goraya, Wallace K Massah, Maria A Bencomo, Roshik Polam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: C. Dominguez-Bali: None. E.S. Tsehaye: None. E. Johnson: None. H.A. Goraya: None. W.K. Massah: None. K. McCoy: None. M.A. Bencomo: None. R. Polam: None. M.A. Syed: None. A. Dominguez-Bali: None. Science and medicine have historically been shaped by religion, culture, politics, and financial interests, often resulting in the denial or neglect of human sexuality as a fundamental aspect of health. Despite the widespread occurrence of sexual dysfunctions and associated social and medical challenges—such as unplanned pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), fertility issues, and mental health crises—formal education in human sexuality remains limited across various fields, including medicine, psychology, and sociology. Medical training programs, particularly in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urology, Family Medicine and Endocrinology offer minimal preparation in sexual histories. Barriers to improvement include lack of training and discomfort with discussing sexual topics, rooted in inadequate sexual education for the people in general but also for the medical schools and residency programs. This study advocates the routine implementation of sexual history-taking in clinical practice by examining existing literature and data from our medical centers. A comprehensive review was conducted, encompassing both medical and sexological literature, supported by data collected from two medical centers.The findings from the literature review and our clinical experience provide statistical support and compelling arguments for integrating sexual history into routine practice, highlighting the potential for improved diagnosis and treatment outcomes. By adopting sexual history-taking as a standard practice in clinical settings, healthcare providers can effectively address a wide range of diagnosable and treatable issues (more than 25 diagnosis rarely found in the regular medical practice), ultimately enhancing the health and well-being of the community. Furthermore, increasing the emphasis on sexual health within medical education and training could lead to significant advancements in patient care. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Clinical Pharmacology of Miami (US), American University of Antigua (AG), University of Gujrat (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Medical History and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.