Comparative Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Roof Beneath Single Piles and Pile Groups in Karst Area

By designing and conducting indoor model tests on single piles and 2 × 2 pile groups under four working conditions—underlying cave, overlying cave, pile penetrating underlying cave, and beaded caves—the failure mode of the roof was explored, and its ultimate bearing capacity was analyzed and compared. Unlike previous studies that focused on single piles in isolation, this paper combines scaled laboratory tests with validated 3D finite element analysis to systematically compare the bearing behaviors of single piles and pile groups under different karst roof conditions. After verifying the model in ABAQUS using the experimental parameters, the researchers established a 3D model of single piles and 2 × 2 pile groups, considering different roof thicknesses, roof spans, cave heights, pile-hole eccentricities, and roof inclination angles. The bearing capacities of single piles and pile groups were analyzed and compared, and the bearing-capacity-improvement factors of pile groups under various working conditions were proposed. The research results show that increasing roof thickness enhances the bearing capacity of both single piles and pile groups, with single piles experiencing more significant improvements. Pile groups boost roof bearing capacity by 455.6% compared to single piles. Conversely, larger roof spans reduce the bearing capacity of both pile types, though pile groups show greater vulnerability to span-related reductions. Notably, increasing pile-hole eccentricity significantly improves the bearing capacity of both configurations. When roof inclination increases, bearing capacity decreases for both systems, with single piles demonstrating greater susceptibility to inclination-induced weakening. These findings reveal distinct mechanical behaviors: pile groups offer stability advantages against span and inclination changes, while single piles benefit more from thickness increases. This divergence highlights the importance of aligning pile configuration with specific structural parameter requirements in engineering design; under different roof sensitivity factors, the bearing capacity improvement of 2 × 2 pile groups relative to single piles is different, and several pile group bearing-capacity-improvement coefficients for five roof sensitivity factors are summarized, and the corresponding and interpolated pile-group bearing-capacity-improvement coefficients are selected when selecting; the influence of the five sensitivity factors is ranked as follows: pile-hole eccentricity > roof thickness > inclination angle > roof span > cave height.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15213809
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Roof Beneath Single Piles and Pile Groups in Karst Area

Jun Hong, Haibo Hu, Chen Liu, Haitao Chen et al.
2 citations
Buildings
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
2.61
article

Comparative Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Roof Beneath Single Piles and Pile Groups in Karst Area

Jun Hong, Haibo Hu, Chen Liu, Haitao Chen, Xinquan Wang, Yue Tian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

By designing and conducting indoor model tests on single piles and 2 × 2 pile groups under four working conditions—underlying cave, overlying cave, pile penetrating underlying cave, and beaded caves—the failure mode of the roof was explored, and its ultimate bearing capacity was analyzed and compared. Unlike previous studies that focused on single piles in isolation, this paper combines scaled laboratory tests with validated 3D finite element analysis to systematically compare the bearing behaviors of single piles and pile groups under different karst roof conditions. After verifying the model in ABAQUS using the experimental parameters, the researchers established a 3D model of single piles and 2 × 2 pile groups, considering different roof thicknesses, roof spans, cave heights, pile-hole eccentricities, and roof inclination angles. The bearing capacities of single piles and pile groups were analyzed and compared, and the bearing-capacity-improvement factors of pile groups under various working conditions were proposed. The research results show that increasing roof thickness enhances the bearing capacity of both single piles and pile groups, with single piles experiencing more significant improvements. Pile groups boost roof bearing capacity by 455.6% compared to single piles. Conversely, larger roof spans reduce the bearing capacity of both pile types, though pile groups show greater vulnerability to span-related reductions. Notably, increasing pile-hole eccentricity significantly improves the bearing capacity of both configurations. When roof inclination increases, bearing capacity decreases for both systems, with single piles demonstrating greater susceptibility to inclination-induced weakening. These findings reveal distinct mechanical behaviors: pile groups offer stability advantages against span and inclination changes, while single piles benefit more from thickness increases. This divergence highlights the importance of aligning pile configuration with specific structural parameter requirements in engineering design; under different roof sensitivity factors, the bearing capacity improvement of 2 × 2 pile groups relative to single piles is different, and several pile group bearing-capacity-improvement coefficients for five roof sensitivity factors are summarized, and the corresponding and interpolated pile-group bearing-capacity-improvement coefficients are selected when selecting; the influence of the five sensitivity factors is ranked as follows: pile-hole eccentricity > roof thickness > inclination angle > roof span > cave height.

BuildingsVol. 15(21)
Anhui University of Science and Technology (CN), Zhejiang Lab (CN), Hangzhou City University, Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.