SUN-659 Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide vs Retatrutide in Weight Loss: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Abstract Disclosure: A. Salhab: None. H. Maraqah: None. Y. Habes: None. M. Abusabha: None. H. Ayesh: None. Background: The global rise in obesity poses a significant public health challenge, contributing to an increased burden of comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers. Dual and triple agonists targeting GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors have emerged as promising therapies for achieving substantial weight loss. Tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonist, and Retatrutide, a triagonist targeting GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy. However, comparative evidence between these therapies remains limited. This network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus retatrutide in achieving weight loss, providing insights for clinical decision-making and guiding future research. Methods: A systematic search across PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov identified 132 studies, with 12 meeting inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences (MD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes included absolute and percentage weight change and adverse events. Results: Retatrutide demonstrated greater absolute weight reduction compared to tirzepatide (Retatrutide: MD -16.34 kg, 95% CI [-22.11; -10.56], p < 0.0001; Tirzepatide: MD -11.82 kg, 95% CI [-15.08; -8.56], p < 0.0001). Percentage weight loss was similarly greater for retatrutide (Retatrutide: MD -23.77%, 95% CI [-29.16; -18.38], p < 0.0001; Tirzepatide: MD -16.79%, 95% CI [-19.62; -13.95], p < 0.0001). Adverse events were more frequent with retatrutide (RR 4.10, 95% CI [1.42; 11.84], p = 0.0092) compared to tirzepatide (RR 2.78, 95% CI [1.98; 3.91], p < 0.0001). Both agents showed significant efficacy compared to placebo in weight reduction and safety profiles, with retatrutide achieving superior outcomes in weight loss parameters. Conclusions: Retatrutide demonstrates superior efficacy in both absolute and percentage weight reduction compared to tirzepatide, albeit with a higher frequency of adverse events. These findings underscore the potential of retatrutide in achieving substantial weight loss and highlight the need for further direct comparisons in head-to-head trials to assess long-term safety and efficacy. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.169
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SUN-659 Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide vs Retatrutide in Weight Loss: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Hazem Ayesh, Yousef M. N. Habes, Ahmad Salhab, Haitham Maraqah et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

SUN-659 Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide vs Retatrutide in Weight Loss: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Hazem Ayesh, Yousef M. N. Habes, Ahmad Salhab, Haitham Maraqah, Mosa Abusabha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: A. Salhab: None. H. Maraqah: None. Y. Habes: None. M. Abusabha: None. H. Ayesh: None. Background: The global rise in obesity poses a significant public health challenge, contributing to an increased burden of comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers. Dual and triple agonists targeting GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors have emerged as promising therapies for achieving substantial weight loss. Tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonist, and Retatrutide, a triagonist targeting GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy. However, comparative evidence between these therapies remains limited. This network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus retatrutide in achieving weight loss, providing insights for clinical decision-making and guiding future research. Methods: A systematic search across PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov identified 132 studies, with 12 meeting inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences (MD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Outcomes included absolute and percentage weight change and adverse events. Results: Retatrutide demonstrated greater absolute weight reduction compared to tirzepatide (Retatrutide: MD -16.34 kg, 95% CI [-22.11; -10.56], p < 0.0001; Tirzepatide: MD -11.82 kg, 95% CI [-15.08; -8.56], p < 0.0001). Percentage weight loss was similarly greater for retatrutide (Retatrutide: MD -23.77%, 95% CI [-29.16; -18.38], p < 0.0001; Tirzepatide: MD -16.79%, 95% CI [-19.62; -13.95], p < 0.0001). Adverse events were more frequent with retatrutide (RR 4.10, 95% CI [1.42; 11.84], p = 0.0092) compared to tirzepatide (RR 2.78, 95% CI [1.98; 3.91], p < 0.0001). Both agents showed significant efficacy compared to placebo in weight reduction and safety profiles, with retatrutide achieving superior outcomes in weight loss parameters. Conclusions: Retatrutide demonstrates superior efficacy in both absolute and percentage weight reduction compared to tirzepatide, albeit with a higher frequency of adverse events. These findings underscore the potential of retatrutide in achieving substantial weight loss and highlight the need for further direct comparisons in head-to-head trials to assess long-term safety and efficacy. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Deaconess Hospital (US), Médecins Sans Frontières (UG), Al-Quds University (PS), Palestine Ahliya University (PS), Médecins Sans Frontières (US), Deaconess Hospital (US), Deaconess Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.