MON-369 Economic Burden of Patients with Graves’ Disease With and Without Thyroid Eye Disease: A Real-World Analysis

Abstract Disclosure: L. Miller-Wilson: Employee of Immunovant, Inc. N. Princic: Employee of Merative. K. Evans: Employee of Merative. N. Atreja: Employee of Immunovant, Inc. K. Tollefsen: Employee of Immunovant, Inc.. D. Toro-Tobón: None. Objectives: Graves’ disease (GD) is an autoimmune condition responsible for most cases of hyperthyroidism in the United States. An estimated 20%-50% of patients with GD will also develop thyroid eye disease (TED). Current treatments for GD focus on managing hyperthyroidism, but frequent monitoring, dose adjustments, and the high rate of relapse after discontinuation of antithyroid drugs can increase treatment costs and complicate long-term management. This study describes healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients with GD, with and without TED. Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized claims data from the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases. Individuals aged ≥18 years with ≥2 claims for a GD diagnosis from January 1, 2017-December 31, 2023 were included (first claim = index). To ensure a newly diagnosed cohort, patients with a history of GD-specific treatment or a GD diagnosis in the 12 months preceding the index were excluded. The final GD cohort was stratified into patients who had evidence of TED at any time during the 12-month pre-index period through 90 days post-index, and those who did not. Propensity score matching was used to balance patients with GD (with and without TED) with non-GD controls (1:3) on demographic and baseline clinical characteristics. Both GD cases (with and without TED) and controls were required to have ≥12 months of post-index follow-up. HCRU and costs were compared between cases and controls during a fixed 12-month post-index period. Categorical outcomes were compared using chi-squared tests, while continuous endpoints were compared using paired t-tests. Results: The analysis included 1,767 GD cases with TED matched with 5,301 controls (mean age, 53.1 years [standardized mean difference (SMD), 0.00]; 77% female [SMD, 0.00]; mean Charlson comorbidity score, 0.9 [SMD, 0.02]) and 43,120 GD cases without TED matched with 129,360 controls (mean age, 49.8 years [SMD, 0.00]; 78% female [SMD, 0.00]; mean Charlson comorbidity score, 0.7 [SMD, 0.01]). Compared with matched controls, patients with GD and TED had 78% more inpatient visits (0.16 vs 0.09), 104% more outpatient visits (65.06 vs 31.86), and 43% more prescriptions (30.21 vs 21.13) during the 12-month post-index period, while patients with GD without TED had 75% more inpatient visits (0.14 vs 0.08), 83% more outpatient visits (52.15 vs 28.48), and 38% more prescriptions (24.27 vs 17.56) (p<0.001 for all). Annual mean healthcare costs were 305% higher ($56,584 vs. $13,981) among GD patients with TED and 65% higher ($19,913 vs $12,076) in those without TED compared with matched controls. Conclusion: Patients with GD had significantly higher HCRU and healthcare costs than matched controls in the 12 months following diagnosis, and this difference was notably greater among GD patients who also had TED. More effective treatments are needed to address the health and financial burden of GD. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025