SAT-259 Comparative Efficacy of Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib: A Network Meta-Analysis of CETP Inhibitors

Abstract Disclosure: A. Jaber: None. J. Zapen: None. Z. Al-Abed: None. J. Abu Zayed: None. H. Ayesh: None. Introduction: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors represent an innovative therapeutic approach to dyslipidemia management by modulating lipid profiles, including increasing HDL and reducing LDL cholesterol. Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib are the most promising agents within this class, showing potential for improving lipid parameters associated with cardiovascular risk. This network meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy of these agents in reducing LDL cholesterol, increasing HDL cholesterol, lowering triglycerides, and reducing apolipoprotein B (ApoB). Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, yielding 22 eligible trials, of which 10 met inclusion criteria. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model to estimate mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) across key lipid parameters. Results: Both Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib demonstrated significant LDL cholesterol reductions compared to placebo (Anacetrapib: MD -30.18 mg/dL, 95% CI [-39.28; -21.08], p < 0.0001; Obicetrapib: MD -32.40 mg/dL, 95% CI [-44.02; -20.78], p < 0.0001). HDL cholesterol increased markedly, with Obicetrapib showing superior efficacy (Obicetrapib: MD +156.77 mg/dL, 95% CI [117.41; 196.13]; Anacetrapib: MD +103.81 mg/dL, 95% CI [78.43; 129.19], p < 0.0001). Triglycerides were significantly reduced by Anacetrapib (MD -9.15 mg/dL, 95% CI [-14.37; -3.94], p < 0.001), though no substantial reduction was noted with Obicetrapib (MD -2.78 mg/dL, 95% CI [-12.04; 6.49], p = 0.56). Both agents significantly lowered ApoB, with comparable reductions (Anacetrapib: MD -20.83 mg/dL, 95% CI [-26.45; -15.21], p < 0.0001; Obicetrapib: MD -20.67 mg/dL, 95% CI [-27.43; -13.92], p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib significantly improve lipid profiles, with Obicetrapib excelling in HDL elevation and Anacetrapib demonstrating superior triglyceride reduction. Both agents are effective in reducing LDL and ApoB. These findings highlight their clinical potential in cardiovascular risk management and underscore the need for further evaluation in larger trials to confirm their safety and long-term efficacy. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.814
Primary Topic
Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SAT-259 Comparative Efficacy of Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib: A Network Meta-Analysis of CETP Inhibitors

Ja’far Zapen, Hazem Ayesh, Abdel Rahman Jaber, Zaid Al-Abed et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
article

SAT-259 Comparative Efficacy of Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib: A Network Meta-Analysis of CETP Inhibitors

Ja’far Zapen, Hazem Ayesh, Abdel Rahman Jaber, Zaid Al-Abed, Jihad Abu Zayed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: A. Jaber: None. J. Zapen: None. Z. Al-Abed: None. J. Abu Zayed: None. H. Ayesh: None. Introduction: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors represent an innovative therapeutic approach to dyslipidemia management by modulating lipid profiles, including increasing HDL and reducing LDL cholesterol. Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib are the most promising agents within this class, showing potential for improving lipid parameters associated with cardiovascular risk. This network meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy of these agents in reducing LDL cholesterol, increasing HDL cholesterol, lowering triglycerides, and reducing apolipoprotein B (ApoB). Methods: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, yielding 22 eligible trials, of which 10 met inclusion criteria. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model to estimate mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) across key lipid parameters. Results: Both Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib demonstrated significant LDL cholesterol reductions compared to placebo (Anacetrapib: MD -30.18 mg/dL, 95% CI [-39.28; -21.08], p < 0.0001; Obicetrapib: MD -32.40 mg/dL, 95% CI [-44.02; -20.78], p < 0.0001). HDL cholesterol increased markedly, with Obicetrapib showing superior efficacy (Obicetrapib: MD +156.77 mg/dL, 95% CI [117.41; 196.13]; Anacetrapib: MD +103.81 mg/dL, 95% CI [78.43; 129.19], p < 0.0001). Triglycerides were significantly reduced by Anacetrapib (MD -9.15 mg/dL, 95% CI [-14.37; -3.94], p < 0.001), though no substantial reduction was noted with Obicetrapib (MD -2.78 mg/dL, 95% CI [-12.04; 6.49], p = 0.56). Both agents significantly lowered ApoB, with comparable reductions (Anacetrapib: MD -20.83 mg/dL, 95% CI [-26.45; -15.21], p < 0.0001; Obicetrapib: MD -20.67 mg/dL, 95% CI [-27.43; -13.92], p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Anacetrapib and Obicetrapib significantly improve lipid profiles, with Obicetrapib excelling in HDL elevation and Anacetrapib demonstrating superior triglyceride reduction. Both agents are effective in reducing LDL and ApoB. These findings highlight their clinical potential in cardiovascular risk management and underscore the need for further evaluation in larger trials to confirm their safety and long-term efficacy. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
University of Jordan (JO), Deaconess Hospital (US), Deaconess Hospital (US), Deaconess Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.