SAT-200 From Prediction To Personalization: Machine Learning Vs Traditional Predictors For GH Response In Pediatric GHD — A Prospective Indian Cohort Study

Abstract Disclosure: K. Gupta: None. B. Sharma: None. S. Saran: None. S.K. Mathur: None. Predicting Growth hormone (GH) therapy response remains challenging in diverse real-world pediatric populations. While the Ranke formula is widely used, its generalizability and accuracy in Indian children remain untested. This prospective observational study included 45 GH-naïve children with GHD from a tertiary Indian center. Baseline and 12-month data included height SDS, growth velocity, bone age, IGF-1, weight SDS, pituitary volume (MRI), and GH dose. The primary outcome was growth velocity (≥10 cm/year); Δ height SDS (>0.5) was evaluated as a secondary outcome. Three predictive models were compared using AUC and RMSE. GH dose-response simulations evaluated individualized dosing potential. The results showed a mean height SDS improvement from –3.15 ± 0.98 to –2.28 ± 0.89 (Δ 0.87 ± 0.35). The mean growth velocity was 10.4 ± 1.9 cm/year. Good response (≥10 cm/year) was observed in 89% children. IGF-1 SDS and bone age delay were significantly associated with height gain (p < 0.01). Younger age and higher GH dose were also predictive of a better response (p < 0.05). Pituitary volume was not independently predictive. Model comparisons showed Random Forest: AUC = 0.84, RMSE = 0.35 SDS (1.78 cm/year); Linear Regression: AUC = 0.74, RMSE = 0.43 SDS (2.21 cm/year); Ranke Formula: AUC = 0.72, RMSE = 0.46 SDS (2.41 cm/year). Dose simulations showed minimal benefit from escalation suggesting standard GH doses were adequate in most cases.This is the first prospective Indian study comparing ML, traditional regression and published formula-based models in GHD. ML outperformed other models in predicting GH response. IGF-1 SDS, bone age delay, and GH dose emerged as key predictors. These findings support the use of AI based tools trained on local data for early prognostication and personalization of GH therapy in children with GHD. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.1768
Primary Topic
Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SAT-200 From Prediction To Personalization: Machine Learning Vs Traditional Predictors For GH Response In Pediatric GHD — A Prospective Indian Cohort Study

Balram Sharma, Sanjay Saran, Kashish Gupta, Sandeep Kumar Mathur
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
article

SAT-200 From Prediction To Personalization: Machine Learning Vs Traditional Predictors For GH Response In Pediatric GHD — A Prospective Indian Cohort Study

Balram Sharma, Sanjay Saran, Kashish Gupta, Sandeep Kumar Mathur
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: K. Gupta: None. B. Sharma: None. S. Saran: None. S.K. Mathur: None. Predicting Growth hormone (GH) therapy response remains challenging in diverse real-world pediatric populations. While the Ranke formula is widely used, its generalizability and accuracy in Indian children remain untested. This prospective observational study included 45 GH-naïve children with GHD from a tertiary Indian center. Baseline and 12-month data included height SDS, growth velocity, bone age, IGF-1, weight SDS, pituitary volume (MRI), and GH dose. The primary outcome was growth velocity (≥10 cm/year); Δ height SDS (>0.5) was evaluated as a secondary outcome. Three predictive models were compared using AUC and RMSE. GH dose-response simulations evaluated individualized dosing potential. The results showed a mean height SDS improvement from –3.15 ± 0.98 to –2.28 ± 0.89 (Δ 0.87 ± 0.35). The mean growth velocity was 10.4 ± 1.9 cm/year. Good response (≥10 cm/year) was observed in 89% children. IGF-1 SDS and bone age delay were significantly associated with height gain (p < 0.01). Younger age and higher GH dose were also predictive of a better response (p < 0.05). Pituitary volume was not independently predictive. Model comparisons showed Random Forest: AUC = 0.84, RMSE = 0.35 SDS (1.78 cm/year); Linear Regression: AUC = 0.74, RMSE = 0.43 SDS (2.21 cm/year); Ranke Formula: AUC = 0.72, RMSE = 0.46 SDS (2.41 cm/year). Dose simulations showed minimal benefit from escalation suggesting standard GH doses were adequate in most cases.This is the first prospective Indian study comparing ML, traditional regression and published formula-based models in GHD. ML outperformed other models in predicting GH response. IGF-1 SDS, bone age delay, and GH dose emerged as key predictors. These findings support the use of AI based tools trained on local data for early prognostication and personalization of GH therapy in children with GHD. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
SMS Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.