SUN-825 Designing a Weight Bias Curriculum: A Qualitative Analysis of Standardized Patient Experiences

Abstract Disclosure: R. Mamtani: None. C. Maskart: None. D. LaMarra: None. S. Cardillo: None. Background: Weight bias in healthcare negatively impacts patient experiences and outcomes. Standardized patients (SPs) who have personally experienced or observed weight bias during clinical encounters may provide valuable insights into how medical trainees communicate about weight. This study aimed to assess SP experiences with weight bias to inform future curricula and interventions. Methods: This study reports the findings of a survey disseminated to the SP program at our institution. The survey invitation asked those who have had had experiences with or observed weight bias during clinical encounters to complete the survey. 18 individuals completed the survey which included open ended questions to assess SP experiences with weight bias. No incentives were offered to participants. The responses were inputted into excel for coding. Analysis included coding of the data set by two authors (RM and SC). Investigators used a constructivist lens when reviewing the coded data set to identify emerging themes. Results: Our qualitative analysis identified several themes including: 1) Emotional impact (SPs described feelings of frustration and decreased self-worth during weight-related discussions. Participants reported that providers implied that their weight issues were entirely within their control, leading to feelings of blame.), 2) Concerns about word choice (SPs described encounters where providers used language that felt accusatory, including suggesting that patients "just need to try harder,” and stigmatizing, using terms such as “morbidly obese.”), 3) Provider Assumptions (SPs noted providers would assume non-compliance without asking. SPs described instances where they were incorrectly assumed to have weight-related medical conditions. SPs prefered for providers to ask permission to discuss weight, rather than assuming the SP was ready to discuss weight.) 4) Lack of detailed evaluation (SPs shared instances where medical concerns were overlooked because providers attributed symptoms solely to weight.) 5) Patient-Centered Care (SPs emphasized the importance of collaborative discussions about weight with a patient-focused rather than weight-focused approach. 6) Education Needs (SPs expressed a desire for provider training on weight bias and education on the complexity of obesity.) Conclusion: Our study highlights SP experiences with weight bias in the clinical setting with medical trainees. These results underscore the necessity of integrating weight bias education into medical training, with an emphasis on respectful language and patient-centered care. These insights will directly inform future interventions including a curriculum designed to equip medical trainees with the skills to navigate weight-related discussions in a non-stigmatizing way. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.1330
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SUN-825 Designing a Weight Bias Curriculum: A Qualitative Analysis of Standardized Patient Experiences

Ronac Mamtani, Serena Cardillo, Denise LaMarra, Cori Maskart
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Obesity and Health Practices
article

SUN-825 Designing a Weight Bias Curriculum: A Qualitative Analysis of Standardized Patient Experiences

Ronac Mamtani, Serena Cardillo, Denise LaMarra, Cori Maskart
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: R. Mamtani: None. C. Maskart: None. D. LaMarra: None. S. Cardillo: None. Background: Weight bias in healthcare negatively impacts patient experiences and outcomes. Standardized patients (SPs) who have personally experienced or observed weight bias during clinical encounters may provide valuable insights into how medical trainees communicate about weight. This study aimed to assess SP experiences with weight bias to inform future curricula and interventions. Methods: This study reports the findings of a survey disseminated to the SP program at our institution. The survey invitation asked those who have had had experiences with or observed weight bias during clinical encounters to complete the survey. 18 individuals completed the survey which included open ended questions to assess SP experiences with weight bias. No incentives were offered to participants. The responses were inputted into excel for coding. Analysis included coding of the data set by two authors (RM and SC). Investigators used a constructivist lens when reviewing the coded data set to identify emerging themes. Results: Our qualitative analysis identified several themes including: 1) Emotional impact (SPs described feelings of frustration and decreased self-worth during weight-related discussions. Participants reported that providers implied that their weight issues were entirely within their control, leading to feelings of blame.), 2) Concerns about word choice (SPs described encounters where providers used language that felt accusatory, including suggesting that patients "just need to try harder,” and stigmatizing, using terms such as “morbidly obese.”), 3) Provider Assumptions (SPs noted providers would assume non-compliance without asking. SPs described instances where they were incorrectly assumed to have weight-related medical conditions. SPs prefered for providers to ask permission to discuss weight, rather than assuming the SP was ready to discuss weight.) 4) Lack of detailed evaluation (SPs shared instances where medical concerns were overlooked because providers attributed symptoms solely to weight.) 5) Patient-Centered Care (SPs emphasized the importance of collaborative discussions about weight with a patient-focused rather than weight-focused approach. 6) Education Needs (SPs expressed a desire for provider training on weight bias and education on the complexity of obesity.) Conclusion: Our study highlights SP experiences with weight bias in the clinical setting with medical trainees. These results underscore the necessity of integrating weight bias education into medical training, with an emphasis on respectful language and patient-centered care. These insights will directly inform future interventions including a curriculum designed to equip medical trainees with the skills to navigate weight-related discussions in a non-stigmatizing way. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.