Muscle Fibers, Free Amino Acids, and Enhanced Mitochondrial Function Explain the Unique Meat Quality of Tibetan Pigs
The mechanistic underlying the favorable meat quality of Tibetan pigs has not been fully elucidated. This study integrated flavor chemistry, histomorphology, and proteomics to explore the structural and molecular features of their meat. Longissimus dorsi samples from Tibetan and Duroc pigs (<i>n</i> = 6 each biological replicates) were quantitatively analyzed for amino acid profiling, histological assessment, and proteomic characteristic. Statistical approaches included weighted correlation network analysis, <i>t</i>-tests, and functional enrichment. Tibetan pork contained 34 mg/100g more total free amino acids, notably sweet-tasting Ala (+49.2%) and Thr (+32.2%). Muscle fiber density was >250% higher and diameter > 30% smaller, indicating finer texture. Proteomics revealed 149 upregulated proteins, including 57 mitochondrial differentially expressed proteins (DEPs)-11 of which belonged to electron transport chain complexes (e.g., NDUFAB1, COX2). The significant enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation pathways may be associated with mitochondrial efficient energy metabolism under hypoxic in Tibetan pigs, potentially linking to the breed's unique meat characteristics. Ala levels showed strong correlations with metabolic and structural protein modules. The finer fibers and mitochondrial protein profile of Tibetan pigs contribute to higher amino acid content and meat quality. This structural-metabolic-flavor axis supports both hypoxia adaptation and high meat quality. Given the central role of mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) proteins in energy metabolism and Ala in flavor presentation, their synergistic action provides a molecular bridge between hypoxia adaptation and meat quality. Therefore, this study suggests that ETC and Ala may serve as key biomarkers for meat quality differences, offering new perspectives for meat quality research.
Authors
- Yanli Ji (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2308-1215)
- Enqin Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6727-6971)
- Bin Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9927-2414)
- Sutian Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-5022)
- Yizhi Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8362-5481)
- Hao Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7103-1486)
- Jie Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7031-2160)
- Fanming Meng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-6714)
- B. Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-244X)
- Ying Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1407-2668)
- Min Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9034-3175)
- Leiyan Cheng
- Haiyun Xin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-7492)
- Jie Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-4442)
- Zhenfang Wu
- Zekai Yao
- Xinxin Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8132-2305)
Institutions
- South China Agricultural University (CN)
- Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
- Shanghai Customs College (CN)
- Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Foods
- Published
- 2025-10-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14213591
- Primary Topic
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- China Agricultural University
- South China Agricultural University
- Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences