MON-254 MALIGNANCY RISK IN TURNER SYNDROME +Y, EARLY GONADECTOMY, AND THE ETHICS OF PARENTAL CHOICES

Abstract Disclosure: C. Ho: None. B. Earp: None. C. Kraus: None. M. Carpenter: None. D. Wilkinson: None. This case relates to an infant with Turner syndrome harboring the Y chromosome (TS+Y) and explores the boundaries of parental decision-making. Traditionally, gonads have been surgically removed in early childhood in this condition because of the risk of gonadoblastoma and potential malignant transformation. However, in the case discussed here, the infant’s parents do not wish for surgery. In other differences of sex development resulting in intersex traits (increasingly termed congenital Variations of Sex Characteristics; VSC), some institutions report a shift in the last decade away from early surgical management, in favor of allowing children to be involved in decision making when they are old enough to participate meaningfully. But should that approach change when there is a risk of malignancy? Unfortunately, there is a lack of good data to delineate this actual malignancy risk, largely due to the fact that historically, many of these gonads were removed. It is regarded by most that this risk becomes higher when the child becomes pubertal. Two commentaries are presented. One outlines ethical considerations around early surgery in the case of VSC, highlighting implications for the child’s bodily integrity and future sexual and reproductive autonomy. A second commentary analyzes the case in terms of pediatric ethics, medical uncertainty, and the zone of parental discretion. Both commentaries conclude that given a lack of adequate data to demonstrate net harms in delaying intervention, and some prospective benefit, it could be reasonable to defer surgery in accordance with the parental request. Though specifically concerning the condition of TS +Y, this discussion provides a framework to consider the ethical boundaries of parental decision-making when it comes to genital surgery in children who have VSC. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.1727
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MON-254 MALIGNANCY RISK IN TURNER SYNDROME +Y, EARLY GONADECTOMY, AND THE ETHICS OF PARENTAL CHOICES

Cindy Ho, Brian David Earp, Dominic Wilkinson, Cynthia Kraus et al.
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

MON-254 MALIGNANCY RISK IN TURNER SYNDROME +Y, EARLY GONADECTOMY, AND THE ETHICS OF PARENTAL CHOICES

Cindy Ho, Brian David Earp, Dominic Wilkinson, Cynthia Kraus, Morgan Carpenter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: C. Ho: None. B. Earp: None. C. Kraus: None. M. Carpenter: None. D. Wilkinson: None. This case relates to an infant with Turner syndrome harboring the Y chromosome (TS+Y) and explores the boundaries of parental decision-making. Traditionally, gonads have been surgically removed in early childhood in this condition because of the risk of gonadoblastoma and potential malignant transformation. However, in the case discussed here, the infant’s parents do not wish for surgery. In other differences of sex development resulting in intersex traits (increasingly termed congenital Variations of Sex Characteristics; VSC), some institutions report a shift in the last decade away from early surgical management, in favor of allowing children to be involved in decision making when they are old enough to participate meaningfully. But should that approach change when there is a risk of malignancy? Unfortunately, there is a lack of good data to delineate this actual malignancy risk, largely due to the fact that historically, many of these gonads were removed. It is regarded by most that this risk becomes higher when the child becomes pubertal. Two commentaries are presented. One outlines ethical considerations around early surgery in the case of VSC, highlighting implications for the child’s bodily integrity and future sexual and reproductive autonomy. A second commentary analyzes the case in terms of pediatric ethics, medical uncertainty, and the zone of parental discretion. Both commentaries conclude that given a lack of adequate data to demonstrate net harms in delaying intervention, and some prospective benefit, it could be reasonable to defer surgery in accordance with the parental request. Though specifically concerning the condition of TS +Y, this discussion provides a framework to consider the ethical boundaries of parental decision-making when it comes to genital surgery in children who have VSC. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
The University of Sydney (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), Australian Human Rights Commission (AU), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), Institute of Social Sciences (RS), Sydney Local Health District (AU), National University Health System (SG), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Institute of Social Sciences (RU), Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.