SAT-655 Comparative Analysis of Glucagon Receptor Agonists vs Resmetirom in MASLD and MASH:Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Abstract Disclosure: C.R. Andonie: None. A. Abusalameh: None. I. Ismail: None. T. Hodrob: None. H. Ayesh: None. Introduction: Metabolic-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) and its progressive form, Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH), represent a global public health challenge due to their rising prevalence, driven by obesity and insulin resistance. These conditions can lead to advanced liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, with no FDA- or EMA-approved treatments currently available. Resmetirom, a thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist, and glucagon receptor agonists (GRAs), such as Cotadutide, Retatrutide, and Survodutide, have demonstrated potential efficacy in recent clinical trials. This network meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of these treatments to address an unmet therapeutic need. Methods: A systematic review of clinical trials was conducted, identifying seven eligible studies involving Resmetirom and GRAs. Outcomes assessed included changes in MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and rates of serious adverse events (SAEs). Random-effects models and network meta-analysis methods were employed to estimate mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) compared to placebo. Results: For MRI-PDFF, Resmetirom demonstrated a significant reduction versus placebo (MD: -47.59%, 95% CI: [-72.84; -22.35], p = 0.0002), comparable to GRAs (MD: -48.93%, 95% CI: [-96.81; -1.05], p = 0.0015). ALT reductions were also substantial, favoring GRAs (MD: -28.97 U/L, 95% CI: [-42.40; -15.55], p < 0.0001) over Resmetirom (MD: -20.08 U/L, 95% CI: [-31.47; -8.70], p = 0.0005). SAE risk was not significantly elevated for Resmetirom (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: [0.77; 1.59], p = 0.58), but GRAs showed a trend toward higher SAE rates (RR: 2.38, 95% CI: [0.98; 5.82], p = 0.056). Conclusions: Both Resmetirom and GRAs effectively reduce liver fat and ALT levels in MASLD/MASH patients, with Resmetirom offering a favorable safety profile and GRAs demonstrating superior ALT reductions but a potential increase in SAE risk. These findings underscore the promise of both therapeutic classes and highlight the need for further comparative trials to inform treatment decisions. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.091
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SAT-655 Comparative Analysis of Glucagon Receptor Agonists vs Resmetirom in MASLD and MASH:Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Hazem Ayesh, I. Ismail, Tamer Hodrob, Alaaeddin Abusalameh et al.
1 citations
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Diabetes Treatment and Management
1.29
article

SAT-655 Comparative Analysis of Glucagon Receptor Agonists vs Resmetirom in MASLD and MASH:Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Hazem Ayesh, I. Ismail, Tamer Hodrob, Alaaeddin Abusalameh, Celina R Andonie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: C.R. Andonie: None. A. Abusalameh: None. I. Ismail: None. T. Hodrob: None. H. Ayesh: None. Introduction: Metabolic-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) and its progressive form, Metabolic-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH), represent a global public health challenge due to their rising prevalence, driven by obesity and insulin resistance. These conditions can lead to advanced liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, with no FDA- or EMA-approved treatments currently available. Resmetirom, a thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist, and glucagon receptor agonists (GRAs), such as Cotadutide, Retatrutide, and Survodutide, have demonstrated potential efficacy in recent clinical trials. This network meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of these treatments to address an unmet therapeutic need. Methods: A systematic review of clinical trials was conducted, identifying seven eligible studies involving Resmetirom and GRAs. Outcomes assessed included changes in MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and rates of serious adverse events (SAEs). Random-effects models and network meta-analysis methods were employed to estimate mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) compared to placebo. Results: For MRI-PDFF, Resmetirom demonstrated a significant reduction versus placebo (MD: -47.59%, 95% CI: [-72.84; -22.35], p = 0.0002), comparable to GRAs (MD: -48.93%, 95% CI: [-96.81; -1.05], p = 0.0015). ALT reductions were also substantial, favoring GRAs (MD: -28.97 U/L, 95% CI: [-42.40; -15.55], p < 0.0001) over Resmetirom (MD: -20.08 U/L, 95% CI: [-31.47; -8.70], p = 0.0005). SAE risk was not significantly elevated for Resmetirom (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: [0.77; 1.59], p = 0.58), but GRAs showed a trend toward higher SAE rates (RR: 2.38, 95% CI: [0.98; 5.82], p = 0.056). Conclusions: Both Resmetirom and GRAs effectively reduce liver fat and ALT levels in MASLD/MASH patients, with Resmetirom offering a favorable safety profile and GRAs demonstrating superior ALT reductions but a potential increase in SAE risk. These findings underscore the promise of both therapeutic classes and highlight the need for further comparative trials to inform treatment decisions. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Al-Quds University (PS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.