Kinematic Comparison of Throw-Down Mechanics Between Baseball and Softball Catchers

Based on previous research, catchers' throwing mechanics between baseball and softball tend to be viewed as comparable despite the inherent differences in playing conditions. When compared at key throwing timepoints, differences in pelvis and trunk kinematics were observed between sports. However, it is uncertain whether throwing-arm mechanics would differ throughout the throw between these athletic populations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare catchers' throwing mechanics between sports using continuous statistical analyses. A total of 20 catchers (baseball: <i>n</i>=10 and softball: <i>n</i>=10) participated in this study. Statistical parametric independent samples <i>t</i>-tests (<i>α</i>=0.05) were used to temporally compare proximal and throwing-arm kinematics from foot contact (0%) to maximum shoulder internal rotation (100%) between sports. Differences found included elbow flexion (<i>p</i>=0.008; 0-13 and 99-100%), shoulder rotation (<i>p</i><0.001; 23-53%), elevation (<i>p</i><0.001; 0-95%) and the plane of elevation (<i>p</i><0.001; 0-100%), pelvis and trunk lateral flexion (pelvis: <i>p</i>=0.027; 0-30% and trunk: <i>p</i><0.001; 23-100%) and rotation (pelvis: <i>p</i>=0.036; 4-21% and trunk: <i>p</i>=0.036; 84-100%), and trunk flexion (<i>p</i><0.001; 34-100%). While most of the observed differences were brief, notable differences in the trunk flexion, trunk lateral flexion, shoulder elevation, and plane of elevation were apparent for much of the throwing motion. Time-series analyses identified distinct mechanics involved in baseball and softball throw downs, lending support for sport-specific biomechanical assessments on catchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2707-5229
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinematic Comparison of Throw-Down Mechanics Between Baseball and Softball Catchers

Gretchen D. Oliver, Billy Lozowski, Anthony Fava, E. Köhler et al.
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Kinematic Comparison of Throw-Down Mechanics Between Baseball and Softball Catchers

Gretchen D. Oliver, Billy Lozowski, Anthony Fava, E. Köhler, Ryan Zappa
article en

Abstract

Based on previous research, catchers' throwing mechanics between baseball and softball tend to be viewed as comparable despite the inherent differences in playing conditions. When compared at key throwing timepoints, differences in pelvis and trunk kinematics were observed between sports. However, it is uncertain whether throwing-arm mechanics would differ throughout the throw between these athletic populations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare catchers' throwing mechanics between sports using continuous statistical analyses. A total of 20 catchers (baseball: <i>n</i>=10 and softball: <i>n</i>=10) participated in this study. Statistical parametric independent samples <i>t</i>-tests (<i>α</i>=0.05) were used to temporally compare proximal and throwing-arm kinematics from foot contact (0%) to maximum shoulder internal rotation (100%) between sports. Differences found included elbow flexion (<i>p</i>=0.008; 0-13 and 99-100%), shoulder rotation (<i>p</i><0.001; 23-53%), elevation (<i>p</i><0.001; 0-95%) and the plane of elevation (<i>p</i><0.001; 0-100%), pelvis and trunk lateral flexion (pelvis: <i>p</i>=0.027; 0-30% and trunk: <i>p</i><0.001; 23-100%) and rotation (pelvis: <i>p</i>=0.036; 4-21% and trunk: <i>p</i>=0.036; 84-100%), and trunk flexion (<i>p</i><0.001; 34-100%). While most of the observed differences were brief, notable differences in the trunk flexion, trunk lateral flexion, shoulder elevation, and plane of elevation were apparent for much of the throwing motion. Time-series analyses identified distinct mechanics involved in baseball and softball throw downs, lending support for sport-specific biomechanical assessments on catchers.

International Journal of Sports Medicine
Auburn University System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.