Analysis of Soft Tissue Healing Over Socket Orifice Sealed with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane

Socket sealing is a technique for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. Leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), an autologous platelet-derived material rich in growth factors, is used to support healing. However, its benefits for soft tissue healing compared with collagen sponge or spontaneous healing remain unclear. This study evaluated soft tissue healing outcomes, wound margin distance, inflammation, postoperative pain, and wound closure area, among sockets treated with L-PRF membrane, collagen sponge, or spontaneous healing.A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 45 extraction sites at the Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Sockets were randomly assigned to L-PRF sealing, collagen sponge sealing, or spontaneous healing. Primary outcomes included wound margin distance reduction percentage, soft tissue healing index, and postoperative pain. The secondary outcome was wound closure area reduction percentage between the L-PRF and collagen sponge groups. Measurements were recorded postoperatively and on days 7, 14, and 21. Pain scores were recorded daily for 1 week. Age, sex, tooth position, and arch were evaluated as covariates.One-way ANOVA with least significant difference post-hoc test was used for primary outcomes, and an independent <i>t</i>-test was used for secondary outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.05).Forty-five teeth were enrolled. Three teeth from the collagen sponge group were excluded due to infection and loss to follow-up; three additional teeth were recruited using the original allocation and randomization protocol. On day 7, L-PRF showed a significantly superior soft tissue healing index than collagen sponge (<i>p</i> = 0.002, 95% CI: [0.28, 1.18]) and spontaneous healing (<i>p</i> = 0.002, 95% CI: [0.28, 1.18]). On day 5, L-PRF reduced pain more than collagen sponge (<i>p</i> = 0.036, 95% CI: [0.04, 1.03]) and spontaneous healing (<i>p</i> = 0.026, 95% CI: [0.07, 1.06]). No significant differences in wound closure distance reduction percentage or wound area reduction percentage were observed among the groups.L-PRF improved soft tissue healing and reduced postoperative pain within the first week, but showed no added benefit in wound closure compared with collagen sponge or spontaneous healing. L-PRF may support short-term symptom relief but not enhanced post-extraction soft tissue regeneration at the clinical relevance level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Dentistry
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1812061
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Soft Tissue Healing Over Socket Orifice Sealed with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane

Prakan Thanasrisuebwong, Bundhit Jirajariyavej, Nisarat Ruangsawasdi, Rann Manlerd
2 citations
European Journal of Dentistry
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
3.67
article

Analysis of Soft Tissue Healing Over Socket Orifice Sealed with Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membrane

Prakan Thanasrisuebwong, Bundhit Jirajariyavej, Nisarat Ruangsawasdi, Rann Manlerd
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Socket sealing is a technique for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. Leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), an autologous platelet-derived material rich in growth factors, is used to support healing. However, its benefits for soft tissue healing compared with collagen sponge or spontaneous healing remain unclear. This study evaluated soft tissue healing outcomes, wound margin distance, inflammation, postoperative pain, and wound closure area, among sockets treated with L-PRF membrane, collagen sponge, or spontaneous healing.A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 45 extraction sites at the Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Sockets were randomly assigned to L-PRF sealing, collagen sponge sealing, or spontaneous healing. Primary outcomes included wound margin distance reduction percentage, soft tissue healing index, and postoperative pain. The secondary outcome was wound closure area reduction percentage between the L-PRF and collagen sponge groups. Measurements were recorded postoperatively and on days 7, 14, and 21. Pain scores were recorded daily for 1 week. Age, sex, tooth position, and arch were evaluated as covariates.One-way ANOVA with least significant difference post-hoc test was used for primary outcomes, and an independent <i>t</i>-test was used for secondary outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.05).Forty-five teeth were enrolled. Three teeth from the collagen sponge group were excluded due to infection and loss to follow-up; three additional teeth were recruited using the original allocation and randomization protocol. On day 7, L-PRF showed a significantly superior soft tissue healing index than collagen sponge (<i>p</i> = 0.002, 95% CI: [0.28, 1.18]) and spontaneous healing (<i>p</i> = 0.002, 95% CI: [0.28, 1.18]). On day 5, L-PRF reduced pain more than collagen sponge (<i>p</i> = 0.036, 95% CI: [0.04, 1.03]) and spontaneous healing (<i>p</i> = 0.026, 95% CI: [0.07, 1.06]). No significant differences in wound closure distance reduction percentage or wound area reduction percentage were observed among the groups.L-PRF improved soft tissue healing and reduced postoperative pain within the first week, but showed no added benefit in wound closure compared with collagen sponge or spontaneous healing. L-PRF may support short-term symptom relief but not enhanced post-extraction soft tissue regeneration at the clinical relevance level.

European Journal of Dentistry
Mahidol University (TH)
Mahidol University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
3.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.