Sensitivity of Airborne Methane Retrieval Algorithms (MF, ACRWL1MF, and DOAS) to Surface Albedo and Types: Hyperspectral Simulation Assessment

Methane (CH4) emissions are a major contributor to greenhouse gases and pose significant challenges to global climate mitigation efforts. The accurate determination of CH4 concentrations via remote sensing is crucial for emission monitoring but remains impeded by surface spectral heterogeneity—notably albedo variations and land cover diversity. This study systematically assessed the sensitivity of three mainstream algorithms, namely, matched filter (MF), albedo-corrected reweighted-L1-matched filter (ACRWL1MF), and differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS), to surface type, albedo, and emission rate through high-fidelity simulation experiments, and proposed a dynamic regularized adaptive matched filter (DRAMF) algorithm. The experiments simulated airborne hyperspectral imagery from the Airborne Visible/InfraRed Imaging Spectrometer-Next Generation (AVIRIS-NG) with known CH4 concentrations over diverse surfaces (including vegetation, soil, and water) and controlled variations in albedo through the large-eddy simulation (LES) mode of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and the MODTRAN radiative transfer model. The results show the following: (1) MF and DOAS have higher true positive rates (TP > 90%) in high-reflectivity scenarios, but the problem of false positives is prominent (TN < 52%); ACRWL1MF significantly improves the true negative rate (TN = 95.9%) through albedo correction but lacks the ability to detect low concentrations of CH4 (TP = 63.8%). (2) All algorithms perform better at high emission rates (1000 kg/h) than at low emission rates (500 kg/h), but ACRWL1MF performs more robustly in low-albedo scenarios. (3) The proposed DRAMF algorithm improves the F1 score (0.129) by about 180% compared to the MF and DOAS algorithms and improves TP value (81.4%) by about 128% compared to the ACRWL1MF algorithm through dynamic background updates and an iterative reweighting mechanism. In practical applications, the DRAMF algorithm can also effectively monitor plumes. This research indicates that algorithms should be selected considering the specific application scenario and provides a direction for technical improvements (e.g., deep learning model) for monitoring gas emission.