Free forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction: fewer revisions and flap failures with two venous anastomoses—a 25-year prospective study

Flap failure is a potential complication following head and neck reconstruction using free vascularized flaps. The value of a second venous anastomosis remains debated. This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent free forearm flap (FFF) surgery to repair head and neck defects between 1998 and 2023, and compared outcomes of FFF with one versus two venous anastomoses. Outcome parameters were surgical vascular revision and flap failure rates. In patients who received radial FFF for primary reconstruction, the rates of vascular revision and flap failure were significantly higher in flaps with one anastomosis (P = 0.045 and P = 0.018, respectively). Analysis of all forearm flaps (radial and ulnar) used for primary or secondary reconstruction, showed that flaps with one venous anastomosis had significantly higher rates of vascular revision (8.3% vs 2.8%, P = 0.031) and flap failure (6.7% vs 2.0%, P = 0.033) than those with two. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that a single venous anastomosis was independently associated with increased odds of vascular revision (P = 0.039) and flap failure (P = 0.015). In conclusion, FFF with one venous anastomosis needed more surgical vascular revision and showed more flap failure than those with two venous anastomoses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.10.003
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Free forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction: fewer revisions and flap failures with two venous anastomoses—a 25-year prospective study

Antoine J.W.P. Rosenberg, Ellen M. Van Cann, François J. Dieleman, Robert J.J. van Es et al.
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Free forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction: fewer revisions and flap failures with two venous anastomoses—a 25-year prospective study

Antoine J.W.P. Rosenberg, Ellen M. Van Cann, François J. Dieleman, Robert J.J. van Es, J. Eelco Bergsma, Casper J. Kuijpers
article en

Abstract

Flap failure is a potential complication following head and neck reconstruction using free vascularized flaps. The value of a second venous anastomosis remains debated. This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent free forearm flap (FFF) surgery to repair head and neck defects between 1998 and 2023, and compared outcomes of FFF with one versus two venous anastomoses. Outcome parameters were surgical vascular revision and flap failure rates. In patients who received radial FFF for primary reconstruction, the rates of vascular revision and flap failure were significantly higher in flaps with one anastomosis (P = 0.045 and P = 0.018, respectively). Analysis of all forearm flaps (radial and ulnar) used for primary or secondary reconstruction, showed that flaps with one venous anastomosis had significantly higher rates of vascular revision (8.3% vs 2.8%, P = 0.031) and flap failure (6.7% vs 2.0%, P = 0.033) than those with two. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that a single venous anastomosis was independently associated with increased odds of vascular revision (P = 0.039) and flap failure (P = 0.015). In conclusion, FFF with one venous anastomosis needed more surgical vascular revision and showed more flap failure than those with two venous anastomoses.

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 55(2)
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Free forearm flaps for head and neck reconstruction: fewer revisions and flap failures with two venous anastomoses—a 25-year prospective study — Antoine J.W.P. Rosenberg, Ellen M. Van Cann, et al. · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS