Comparing the Performance of McMaster, FLOTAC and Mini-FLOTAC Techniques in the Diagnosis of Strongylid Infections in Two Horse Populations in Portugal

The diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) strongyle infections in equids is still mainly performed using quantitative coprological techniques, like the McMaster (McM), but more sensitive and precise techniques, like FLOTAC (FL) and Mini-FLOTAC (MF), have been proposed over the past 20 years. The present study aimed to compare the analytical performance of these three methods in the diagnosis of strongyle infections in horses. Between October 2023 and June 2024, 32 fecal samples were processed using the McM, FL and MF techniques to identify strongyles' eggs, estimate their shedding (eggs per gram of feces, EPG), standard errors, sensitivities, precisions, and perform Spearman's correlation and Cohen's kappa analyses. The McM detected a higher shedding (584 ± 179 EPG), in comparison with FL and MF, with both these differences being statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001); FL achieved the highest precision (72%), which differed significantly from McM (<i>p</i> = 0.03). All techniques were positively (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.92-0.96) and significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001) correlated and shared substantial (k = 0.67-0.76) and significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001) agreement. The MF achieved the highest diagnostic sensitivity (93%), followed by FL (89%) and McM (85%), although not significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.90). These results suggest the usefulness of implementing FL or MF methods in equine medicine for precise and, in the latter case, quick parasitological diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pathogens
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14111075
Primary Topic
Helminth infection and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Performance of McMaster, FLOTAC and Mini-FLOTAC Techniques in the Diagnosis of Strongylid Infections in Two Horse Populations in Portugal

Luís Madeira de Carvalho, Laura Rinaldi, Lídia Gomes, Manuela Oliveira et al.
Pathogens
Helminth infection and control
article

Comparing the Performance of McMaster, FLOTAC and Mini-FLOTAC Techniques in the Diagnosis of Strongylid Infections in Two Horse Populations in Portugal

Luís Madeira de Carvalho, Laura Rinaldi, Lídia Gomes, Manuela Oliveira, A. Paz‐Silva, L. P. Lamas, João Lozano, Teresa Maria Rodrigues da Fonseca Rosa, Marta Varandas, Mariana Timponi França Magalhães, Ricardo Agrícola
article en

Abstract

The diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) strongyle infections in equids is still mainly performed using quantitative coprological techniques, like the McMaster (McM), but more sensitive and precise techniques, like FLOTAC (FL) and Mini-FLOTAC (MF), have been proposed over the past 20 years. The present study aimed to compare the analytical performance of these three methods in the diagnosis of strongyle infections in horses. Between October 2023 and June 2024, 32 fecal samples were processed using the McM, FL and MF techniques to identify strongyles' eggs, estimate their shedding (eggs per gram of feces, EPG), standard errors, sensitivities, precisions, and perform Spearman's correlation and Cohen's kappa analyses. The McM detected a higher shedding (584 ± 179 EPG), in comparison with FL and MF, with both these differences being statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001); FL achieved the highest precision (72%), which differed significantly from McM (<i>p</i> = 0.03). All techniques were positively (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.92-0.96) and significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001) correlated and shared substantial (k = 0.67-0.76) and significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001) agreement. The MF achieved the highest diagnostic sensitivity (93%), followed by FL (89%) and McM (85%), although not significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.90). These results suggest the usefulness of implementing FL or MF methods in equine medicine for precise and, in the latter case, quick parasitological diagnosis.

PathogensVol. 14(11)
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Centre for Research in Anthropology (PT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Universidade de Lisboa, Xunta de Galicia, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Helminth infection and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.