Abstract C073: Heritable resistance and phenotypic stochasticity are likely drivers of irreproducibility in experimental determination of <i>in vitro</i> potency of anticancer agents

Abstract Background: The estimation of the in vitro potency of anticancer agents against tumor cell lines in tissue culture is known to be fraught with a high degree of variability. While quality control of experimental conditions has been demonstrated by others to reduce this variability, other sources of variability remain even after standardization of experimental conditions. In this poster, we assess two potential mechanisms for this residual variability: phenotypic stochasticity in response and heritable resistance to treatment. Methods: We developed three agent-based mathematical models representing different potential scenarios for cellular responses to anticancer therapy: (1) all cells have an equal probability of survival under treatment (phenotypic stochasticity) and future division; (2) sensitive cells deterministically die under treatment while resistant cells survive and may divide to produce resistant offspring (heritable resistance); (3) sensitive subclones have a greater probability of death under treatment compared to resistant subclones (both mechanisms). We implemented these models in MATLAB, running simulated in vitro experiments consisting of large (106) or small (500 or 5000) populations of virtual cells under treatment. The final size of these virtual cell populations serves as the readout of the virtual experiments. To assess the effect of phenotypic stochasticity and heritable resistance on variation in experimental outcomes, we simulated these experiments 10,000 times and report the coefficient of variation (CV). Results: Variability in response to treatment was low under most simulated conditions. In the first model simulating phenotypic stochasticity alone, high coefficients of variation in assay outcome were observed only when the probability of survival under treatment was less than 10%. In simulations of deterministic heritable survival under treatment, the coefficient of variation was generally low. However, simulations incorporating both mechanisms exhibited substantial variability in experimental outcome, consistent with the observed phenomenon. Conclusions: Stochastic cellular response to treatment or heritable binary resistance alone are insufficient explanations for the variation in in vitro experimental results. On the other hand, the high degree of variation in experimental outcomes is consistent with a combination of heritable resistance and phenotypic stochasticity. Our findings are consistent with a role for Darwinian evolution in the response to anticancer treatment for cancer cells in tissue culture. Citation Format: Alexander L. Young, Liam Noronha, Madison Stoddard, T Ryan. Gregory, Arijit Chakravarty. Heritable resistance and phenotypic stochasticity are likely drivers of irreproducibility in experimental determination of in vitro potency of anticancer agents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2025 Oct 22-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr C073.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.targ-25-c073
Primary Topic
Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract C073: Heritable resistance and phenotypic stochasticity are likely drivers of irreproducibility in experimental determination of in vitro potency of anticancer agents

T. Ryan Gregory, Arijit Chakravarty, Alexander L. Young, Madison Stoddard et al.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
article

Abstract C073: Heritable resistance and phenotypic stochasticity are likely drivers of irreproducibility in experimental determination of in vitro potency of anticancer agents

T. Ryan Gregory, Arijit Chakravarty, Alexander L. Young, Madison Stoddard, Laura Formighieri de Noronha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The estimation of the in vitro potency of anticancer agents against tumor cell lines in tissue culture is known to be fraught with a high degree of variability. While quality control of experimental conditions has been demonstrated by others to reduce this variability, other sources of variability remain even after standardization of experimental conditions. In this poster, we assess two potential mechanisms for this residual variability: phenotypic stochasticity in response and heritable resistance to treatment. Methods: We developed three agent-based mathematical models representing different potential scenarios for cellular responses to anticancer therapy: (1) all cells have an equal probability of survival under treatment (phenotypic stochasticity) and future division; (2) sensitive cells deterministically die under treatment while resistant cells survive and may divide to produce resistant offspring (heritable resistance); (3) sensitive subclones have a greater probability of death under treatment compared to resistant subclones (both mechanisms). We implemented these models in MATLAB, running simulated in vitro experiments consisting of large (106) or small (500 or 5000) populations of virtual cells under treatment. The final size of these virtual cell populations serves as the readout of the virtual experiments. To assess the effect of phenotypic stochasticity and heritable resistance on variation in experimental outcomes, we simulated these experiments 10,000 times and report the coefficient of variation (CV). Results: Variability in response to treatment was low under most simulated conditions. In the first model simulating phenotypic stochasticity alone, high coefficients of variation in assay outcome were observed only when the probability of survival under treatment was less than 10%. In simulations of deterministic heritable survival under treatment, the coefficient of variation was generally low. However, simulations incorporating both mechanisms exhibited substantial variability in experimental outcome, consistent with the observed phenomenon. Conclusions: Stochastic cellular response to treatment or heritable binary resistance alone are insufficient explanations for the variation in in vitro experimental results. On the other hand, the high degree of variation in experimental outcomes is consistent with a combination of heritable resistance and phenotypic stochasticity. Our findings are consistent with a role for Darwinian evolution in the response to anticancer treatment for cancer cells in tissue culture. Citation Format: Alexander L. Young, Liam Noronha, Madison Stoddard, T Ryan. Gregory, Arijit Chakravarty. Heritable resistance and phenotypic stochasticity are likely drivers of irreproducibility in experimental determination of in vitro potency of anticancer agents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2025 Oct 22-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr C073.

Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsVol. 24(10_Supplement)
Harvard University (US), Accent Therapeutics (United States) (US), Vedantra Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.