The IUS-4: A Psychometric Evaluation of an Ultra-Brief Intolerance of Uncertainty Measure

Abstract This study investigated the psychometric properties of a newly proposed ultra-brief version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS), the IUS-4. Intolerance of uncertainty, a broad cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reaction to ambiguous or uncertain situations, is a transdiagnostic variable associated with various psychopathologies, including anxiety and depression. While the 27-item IUS and its 12-item short form (IUS-12) are widely used, shorter versions are needed for efficiency in clinical and research settings. The IUS-4 comprises four items from the IUS-12 designed to capture the core construct of intolerance of uncertainty. This study aimed to: (a) develop an ultra-brief version of the IUS and examine its factor structure, (b) estimate its reliability, (c) analyze measurement invariance across sexes, and (d) establish its relationship with anxiety, depression, emotional dysregulation, and worry. A sample of 1,374 participants who sought psychological help completed an online questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a unidimensional model for the IUS-4, with acceptable internal consistency (omega = 0.81). Multigroup invariance analysis confirmed equivalence across sexes. Associative validity was demonstrated through positive correlations between the IUS-4 and measures of emotional dysregulation, depression, worry, and, to a lesser extent, anxiety. These findings suggest that the IUS-4 is a reliable and valid measure of intolerance of uncertainty, offering a practical and efficient tool for assessment in research and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-025-00626-w
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The IUS-4: A Psychometric Evaluation of an Ultra-Brief Intolerance of Uncertainty Measure

Lorena A. Flores-Plata, Anabel De la Rosa-Gómez, Alejandrina Hernández-Posadas, Griselda Suzán-Montoya et al.
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

The IUS-4: A Psychometric Evaluation of an Ultra-Brief Intolerance of Uncertainty Measure

Lorena A. Flores-Plata, Anabel De la Rosa-Gómez, Alejandrina Hernández-Posadas, Griselda Suzán-Montoya, Andrea Alvarez-López, Zuleyca Pérez-Martínez
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the psychometric properties of a newly proposed ultra-brief version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS), the IUS-4. Intolerance of uncertainty, a broad cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reaction to ambiguous or uncertain situations, is a transdiagnostic variable associated with various psychopathologies, including anxiety and depression. While the 27-item IUS and its 12-item short form (IUS-12) are widely used, shorter versions are needed for efficiency in clinical and research settings. The IUS-4 comprises four items from the IUS-12 designed to capture the core construct of intolerance of uncertainty. This study aimed to: (a) develop an ultra-brief version of the IUS and examine its factor structure, (b) estimate its reliability, (c) analyze measurement invariance across sexes, and (d) establish its relationship with anxiety, depression, emotional dysregulation, and worry. A sample of 1,374 participants who sought psychological help completed an online questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a unidimensional model for the IUS-4, with acceptable internal consistency (omega = 0.81). Multigroup invariance analysis confirmed equivalence across sexes. Associative validity was demonstrated through positive correlations between the IUS-4 and measures of emotional dysregulation, depression, worry, and, to a lesser extent, anxiety. These findings suggest that the IUS-4 is a reliable and valid measure of intolerance of uncertainty, offering a practical and efficient tool for assessment in research and clinical practice.

Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior TherapyVol. 43(4)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.