Development of a new cell isolation device FlowMagicTM

Isolation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from blood typically involves a density gradient medium during density centrifugation. The problem of increasing red blood cell (RBC) and granulocyte (GRA) contamination during PBMC isolation as the elapsed time after blood collection increases remains unresolved. As a countermeasure against RBC contamination, hemolysis treatment is available; however, these extra steps are laborious, time-consuming, and could introduce artifacts. To overcome this challenge, we developed a novel isolation device, FlowMagic™, which features a proprietary two-layer insert structure designed to prevent RBC and GRA contamination during PBMC isolation from blood. The efficacy of this method was evaluated by isolating PBMCs from donors and analyzing immune cell populations by flow cytometry. Compared to SepMate (median (Q50) = 11.0, interquartile ranges (IQR): 8.8-19.5; p < 0.01) and Lymphoprep methods (Q50 = 9.3, IQR: 6.6-13.5; p < 0.01), FlowMagic™ achieved significantly greater reduction in RBC contamination to below detectable limits (Q50 = 0.0, IQR: 0.0-0.0), with sustained efficacy observed up to 72 hours post-collection. Additionally, the FlowMagic™ method (Q50 = 2.5, IQR: 0.5-3.4, at 48 hours, median = 4.5, IQR: 2.1-10.3, at 72 hours, respectively) significantly reduced GRA contamination compared with the SepMate (Q50 = 12.0, IQR: 7.8-25.5, at 48 hours, Q50 = 27.5, IQR: 12.3-29.0, at 72 hours, respectively; p < 0.01) and Lymphoprep methods (Q50 = 10.5, IQR: 6.9-19.8, at 48 hours, Q50 = 17.5, IQR: 13.3-23.5, at 72 hours, respectively; p < 0.01) at 48 and 72 hours after blood collection. Furthermore, the recovery rates of CD3 + , CD4 + , CD8 + , CD19 + , and CD16/56 + cells in the FlowMagic™-isolated PBMCs (Q50 = 8.6, 5.9, 2.5, 1.3, and 1.9, respectively) were significantly improved compared to those in SepMate- (Q50 = 2.2, 1.5, 0.7, 0.4, and 0.5, respectively; p < 0.01) and Lymphoprep-isolated PBMCs (Q50 = 2.4, 1.5, 0.8, 0.6, and 0.8, respectively; p < 0.01), even at 48 hours after blood collection. These findings suggest that the PBMC isolation method using FlowMagic™ is advantageous in preventing RBC and GRA contamination for research, diagnostic, and clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334936
Primary Topic
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a new cell isolation device FlowMagicTM

Atsushi Tsuruta, Takeyuki Kotaka, Yoshiaki Sakamoto, Robert E. Kimura et al.
PLoS ONE
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
article

Development of a new cell isolation device FlowMagicTM

Atsushi Tsuruta, Takeyuki Kotaka, Yoshiaki Sakamoto, Robert E. Kimura, Tsubasa Yoshida, Nozomi Shiozawa
article en

Abstract

Isolation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from blood typically involves a density gradient medium during density centrifugation. The problem of increasing red blood cell (RBC) and granulocyte (GRA) contamination during PBMC isolation as the elapsed time after blood collection increases remains unresolved. As a countermeasure against RBC contamination, hemolysis treatment is available; however, these extra steps are laborious, time-consuming, and could introduce artifacts. To overcome this challenge, we developed a novel isolation device, FlowMagic™, which features a proprietary two-layer insert structure designed to prevent RBC and GRA contamination during PBMC isolation from blood. The efficacy of this method was evaluated by isolating PBMCs from donors and analyzing immune cell populations by flow cytometry. Compared to SepMate (median (Q50) = 11.0, interquartile ranges (IQR): 8.8-19.5; p < 0.01) and Lymphoprep methods (Q50 = 9.3, IQR: 6.6-13.5; p < 0.01), FlowMagic™ achieved significantly greater reduction in RBC contamination to below detectable limits (Q50 = 0.0, IQR: 0.0-0.0), with sustained efficacy observed up to 72 hours post-collection. Additionally, the FlowMagic™ method (Q50 = 2.5, IQR: 0.5-3.4, at 48 hours, median = 4.5, IQR: 2.1-10.3, at 72 hours, respectively) significantly reduced GRA contamination compared with the SepMate (Q50 = 12.0, IQR: 7.8-25.5, at 48 hours, Q50 = 27.5, IQR: 12.3-29.0, at 72 hours, respectively; p < 0.01) and Lymphoprep methods (Q50 = 10.5, IQR: 6.9-19.8, at 48 hours, Q50 = 17.5, IQR: 13.3-23.5, at 72 hours, respectively; p < 0.01) at 48 and 72 hours after blood collection. Furthermore, the recovery rates of CD3 + , CD4 + , CD8 + , CD19 + , and CD16/56 + cells in the FlowMagic™-isolated PBMCs (Q50 = 8.6, 5.9, 2.5, 1.3, and 1.9, respectively) were significantly improved compared to those in SepMate- (Q50 = 2.2, 1.5, 0.7, 0.4, and 0.5, respectively; p < 0.01) and Lymphoprep-isolated PBMCs (Q50 = 2.4, 1.5, 0.8, 0.6, and 0.8, respectively; p < 0.01), even at 48 hours after blood collection. These findings suggest that the PBMC isolation method using FlowMagic™ is advantageous in preventing RBC and GRA contamination for research, diagnostic, and clinical applications.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
CellFree Sciences (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.