Unpleasant but effective: Newspaper coverage of cancer screening and cancer in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2022

Participation rates in cancer screening programs (CSPs) have shown a declining trend, and research suggests that news media reports may contribute to public opinion. Therefore, we aimed to understand how Dutch news media report on CSPs. We mainly focused on breast, colorectal, and cervical CSPs but did not exclude reports on other cancer types. Through a systematic content analysis 5,503 news articles from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed for key characteristics such as topic and reported cancer type. Results showed that most news reports framed CSPs as effective and beneficial for public health. The reliability of screening methods was sometimes criticized. In these cases, reports discussed overdiagnosis or medicalization. Although reports were positive about CSPs' effectiveness, they were sometimes negative about organizational, psychological, and physiological aspects. Early detection and diagnosis of cancer are portrayed as having benefits that outweigh the costs. These findings show that news media often describe CSPs as a 'necessary evil' and that participation may be inconvenient and stressful, but that early detection and diagnosis of cancer are benefits that seem to outweigh this necessary evil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334121
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpleasant but effective: Newspaper coverage of cancer screening and cancer in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2022

M. Jansen, Gert‐Jan de Bruijn, Suzan Verberne, Inge Stortenbeker et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
article

Unpleasant but effective: Newspaper coverage of cancer screening and cancer in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2022

M. Jansen, Gert‐Jan de Bruijn, Suzan Verberne, Inge Stortenbeker, Enny H. H. J. Das, Hanneke Hendriks
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Participation rates in cancer screening programs (CSPs) have shown a declining trend, and research suggests that news media reports may contribute to public opinion. Therefore, we aimed to understand how Dutch news media report on CSPs. We mainly focused on breast, colorectal, and cervical CSPs but did not exclude reports on other cancer types. Through a systematic content analysis 5,503 news articles from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed for key characteristics such as topic and reported cancer type. Results showed that most news reports framed CSPs as effective and beneficial for public health. The reliability of screening methods was sometimes criticized. In these cases, reports discussed overdiagnosis or medicalization. Although reports were positive about CSPs' effectiveness, they were sometimes negative about organizational, psychological, and physiological aspects. Early detection and diagnosis of cancer are portrayed as having benefits that outweigh the costs. These findings show that news media often describe CSPs as a 'necessary evil' and that participation may be inconvenient and stressful, but that early detection and diagnosis of cancer are benefits that seem to outweigh this necessary evil.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
Leiden University (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Antwerp (BE)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.