Unsafe driving behavior and safety law support: unraveling the influence of drivers’ demographics

Understanding how demographic attributes influence risky driving and support for traffic safety laws is essential for developing targeted regulations. This study analyzes self-reported data from Canadian drivers to identify high-risk groups using accident history and acceptance of unsafe behaviors. Two cases are examined: Case 1 focuses on accidents and demerit points; Case 2 focuses on acceptance of risky behaviors. The analysis involves k-means clustering to classify risk groups, factor analysis to group safety regulations into three categories—speeding, distracted/intoxicated driving, and red-light violations—and logistic regression to explore demographic associations. Key findings show that driving experience, income, and region influence risk in Case 1, while vehicle size, driving frequency, gender, age, and income are significant in Case 2. Senior drivers tend to support stricter safety laws opposing distracted and intoxicated driving, over-speeding, and red-light violation. The study’s results can inform targeted driver education, address high-risk groups, and enhance traffic regulation policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2025-0235
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsafe driving behavior and safety law support: unraveling the influence of drivers’ demographics

Sushreeta Mishra, Babak Mehran, Tara Saeidi
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Unsafe driving behavior and safety law support: unraveling the influence of drivers’ demographics

Sushreeta Mishra, Babak Mehran, Tara Saeidi
article en

Abstract

Understanding how demographic attributes influence risky driving and support for traffic safety laws is essential for developing targeted regulations. This study analyzes self-reported data from Canadian drivers to identify high-risk groups using accident history and acceptance of unsafe behaviors. Two cases are examined: Case 1 focuses on accidents and demerit points; Case 2 focuses on acceptance of risky behaviors. The analysis involves k-means clustering to classify risk groups, factor analysis to group safety regulations into three categories—speeding, distracted/intoxicated driving, and red-light violations—and logistic regression to explore demographic associations. Key findings show that driving experience, income, and region influence risk in Case 1, while vehicle size, driving frequency, gender, age, and income are significant in Case 2. Senior drivers tend to support stricter safety laws opposing distracted and intoxicated driving, over-speeding, and red-light violation. The study’s results can inform targeted driver education, address high-risk groups, and enhance traffic regulation policies.

Canadian Journal of Civil EngineeringVol. 53
United States Department of Transportation (US), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.