Archetypes of cow-calf systems on Campos grasslands from an ecological intensification perspective, their productivity and trophic performance

Cow-calf systems on native grasslands dominate family farms in South America. Little is known about the diversity of the practices implemented by farmers and their relation to the productive outcomes achieved. This study aimed to classify Uruguayan cow-calf farm systems based on distinct combinations of strategic, tactical, and decision-supporting techniques and their productive results. We used two datasets combined with archetype and discriminant analyses. The first, more general dataset contained results from a representative survey of Uruguayan livestock farms. The second, highly detailed dataset included information on 28 family farms that had participated in a co-innovation project. The first dataset was used to elucidate archetypes. Next, each of the 28 farms were assigned to the archetypes using discriminant analysis. Finally, the archetypes were compared in terms of structural and functional variables. Four archetypes (A1 to A4) of cow-calf systems emerged. A1 and A4 exhibited strongly contrasting levels of technique implementation, while A2 and A3 were intermediate. The archetype with the highest level of technique application (A1) achieved the best performance in beef production, weaning percentage, and weight of calves at weaning as well as in trophic and conversion efficiency. Surprisingly, no differences in above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) were detected, which questions the sensitivity of the widely used remote-sensing based indicator. The difference in productive performance between the archetypes represents a gap that can be closed by increasing the application of ecological intensification techniques. Our results indicate that knowledge and application of ecologically intensive management rather than farm resource endowment is the primary factor enabling productivity and trophic efficiency increases in cow-calf systems on the Pampas and Campos. The results call for investment in training and support of farmers, using a systems perspective. • Diversity of Campos cow-calf systems is captured by four archetypes. • Better performance for the archetype with greatest implementation of techniques. • Archetypes did not differ in a commonly used forage production indicator. • Ecologically intensive management improved trophic efficiency. • Interventions need to be tailored to farm's archetype.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Systems
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104533
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rural Development and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Archetypes of cow-calf systems on Campos grasslands from an ecological intensification perspective, their productivity and trophic performance

I. Paparamborda, P. Soca, Santiago Dogliotti, W.A.H. Rossing
2 citations
Agricultural Systems
Rural Development and Agriculture
4.84
article

Archetypes of cow-calf systems on Campos grasslands from an ecological intensification perspective, their productivity and trophic performance

I. Paparamborda, P. Soca, Santiago Dogliotti, W.A.H. Rossing
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Cow-calf systems on native grasslands dominate family farms in South America. Little is known about the diversity of the practices implemented by farmers and their relation to the productive outcomes achieved. This study aimed to classify Uruguayan cow-calf farm systems based on distinct combinations of strategic, tactical, and decision-supporting techniques and their productive results. We used two datasets combined with archetype and discriminant analyses. The first, more general dataset contained results from a representative survey of Uruguayan livestock farms. The second, highly detailed dataset included information on 28 family farms that had participated in a co-innovation project. The first dataset was used to elucidate archetypes. Next, each of the 28 farms were assigned to the archetypes using discriminant analysis. Finally, the archetypes were compared in terms of structural and functional variables. Four archetypes (A1 to A4) of cow-calf systems emerged. A1 and A4 exhibited strongly contrasting levels of technique implementation, while A2 and A3 were intermediate. The archetype with the highest level of technique application (A1) achieved the best performance in beef production, weaning percentage, and weight of calves at weaning as well as in trophic and conversion efficiency. Surprisingly, no differences in above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) were detected, which questions the sensitivity of the widely used remote-sensing based indicator. The difference in productive performance between the archetypes represents a gap that can be closed by increasing the application of ecological intensification techniques. Our results indicate that knowledge and application of ecologically intensive management rather than farm resource endowment is the primary factor enabling productivity and trophic efficiency increases in cow-calf systems on the Pampas and Campos. The results call for investment in training and support of farmers, using a systems perspective. • Diversity of Campos cow-calf systems is captured by four archetypes. • Better performance for the archetype with greatest implementation of techniques. • Archetypes did not differ in a commonly used forage production indicator. • Ecologically intensive management improved trophic efficiency. • Interventions need to be tailored to farm's archetype.

Agricultural SystemsVol. 231
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Rural Development and Agriculture
4.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.