Irrigation strategies for upland rice cultivars in Brazil: Physiological responses and agronomic performance

Irrigation strategies are essential for enhancing water productivity, thereby contributing to the sustainable water management in upland rice ( Oryza sativa L.). This study aimed to quantify the effects of various irrigation strategies on the physiology, yield, and irrigation water productivity of three upland rice cultivars. Two shelter experiments (A and B) were conducted using two factors: irrigation managements and cultivars. In Experiment A, three irrigation levels were applied: 100 % (Control), 70 % and 40 % of the irrigation applied in the control. In Experiment B, irrigation was triggered at soil water potential thresholds of −20 and −40 kPa. The cultivars used in both experiments were BRS A501 CL, BRS Esmeralda, and BRS A502. In Experiment A, the Control treatment (100 %) demanded ∼786 mm of water, which yielded 7.9 Mg ha −1 , corresponding to an irrigation water productivity of 0.88 kg m −3 . Irrigation levels of 70 % (579 mm) and 40 % (371 mm) caused yield reductions of 51–96 % and irrigation water productivity declines of 32–92 %. In Experiment B, the treatment of −20 kPa (683 mm) yielded 6.8 Mg ha −1 and 1.0 kg m −3 of irrigation water productivity. The irrigation threshold of −40 kPa (∼590 mm applied) resulted in an average grain yield of 5.3 Mg ha −1 and irrigation water productivity of 0.89 kg m −3 . Overall, although drought-tolerant cultivars were used, water-saving treatments in Experiment A (70 and 40 %) were not suitable for upland rice. In contrast, the −40 kPa irrigation threshold in Experiment B reduced water use while maintaining irrigation water productivity, representing an effective strategy for water-limited environments. Future work should explore irrigation strategies based on Experiment B, targeting specific growth stages. • Irrigation levels and irrigation at different soil water potential thresholds were tested. • Cultivars BRS Esmeralda and BRS A502 showed contrasting gas exchange performance at anthesis among experiments. • Irrigation levels of 70 % and 40 % reduced both grain yield and irrigation water productivity. • Irrigation at −20 and −40 kPa thresholds maintained comparable irrigation water productivity. • Grain yield under irrigation at –40 kPa was 22 % lower than under –20 kPa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109914
Primary Topic
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Irrigation strategies for upland rice cultivars in Brazil: Physiological responses and agronomic performance

Carlos Alberto Quiloango‐Chimarro, Rubens Duarte Coelho, Jéfferson de Oliveira Costa, Alexandre Bryan Heinemann et al.
Agricultural Water Management
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
article

Irrigation strategies for upland rice cultivars in Brazil: Physiological responses and agronomic performance

Carlos Alberto Quiloango‐Chimarro, Rubens Duarte Coelho, Jéfferson de Oliveira Costa, Alexandre Bryan Heinemann, Alice da Silva Gundim, Tainá Ferreira da Rocha
article en

Abstract

Irrigation strategies are essential for enhancing water productivity, thereby contributing to the sustainable water management in upland rice ( Oryza sativa L.). This study aimed to quantify the effects of various irrigation strategies on the physiology, yield, and irrigation water productivity of three upland rice cultivars. Two shelter experiments (A and B) were conducted using two factors: irrigation managements and cultivars. In Experiment A, three irrigation levels were applied: 100 % (Control), 70 % and 40 % of the irrigation applied in the control. In Experiment B, irrigation was triggered at soil water potential thresholds of −20 and −40 kPa. The cultivars used in both experiments were BRS A501 CL, BRS Esmeralda, and BRS A502. In Experiment A, the Control treatment (100 %) demanded ∼786 mm of water, which yielded 7.9 Mg ha −1 , corresponding to an irrigation water productivity of 0.88 kg m −3 . Irrigation levels of 70 % (579 mm) and 40 % (371 mm) caused yield reductions of 51–96 % and irrigation water productivity declines of 32–92 %. In Experiment B, the treatment of −20 kPa (683 mm) yielded 6.8 Mg ha −1 and 1.0 kg m −3 of irrigation water productivity. The irrigation threshold of −40 kPa (∼590 mm applied) resulted in an average grain yield of 5.3 Mg ha −1 and irrigation water productivity of 0.89 kg m −3 . Overall, although drought-tolerant cultivars were used, water-saving treatments in Experiment A (70 and 40 %) were not suitable for upland rice. In contrast, the −40 kPa irrigation threshold in Experiment B reduced water use while maintaining irrigation water productivity, representing an effective strategy for water-limited environments. Future work should explore irrigation strategies based on Experiment B, targeting specific growth stages. • Irrigation levels and irrigation at different soil water potential thresholds were tested. • Cultivars BRS Esmeralda and BRS A502 showed contrasting gas exchange performance at anthesis among experiments. • Irrigation levels of 70 % and 40 % reduced both grain yield and irrigation water productivity. • Irrigation at −20 and −40 kPa thresholds maintained comparable irrigation water productivity. • Grain yield under irrigation at –40 kPa was 22 % lower than under –20 kPa.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 321
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz (BR), Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.