Current performance and future potential of youth elite-level football players: Insights from both objective data and coach assessments

Football clubs use both objective and subjective assessments to continuously identify the most promising players and develop them towards professional athletes. This study investigated the associations between clubs' objective and subjective performance measures to gain a deeper understanding of their interplay. To this end, 331 elite youth football players (9 to 14 years) completed a test battery assessing anthropometry, physical performance, technical performance, and motor coordination. Additionally, coaches rated players' current performance and future potential using a visual analogue scale (0-100). Univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis with 95% confidence intervals were applied to explore associations between objective and subjective measures. A strong correlation emerged between performance and potential ratings (r = 0.70). Furthermore, faster sprint times, higher jumps, and better change of direction appeared to be associated with higher subjective ratings. The sprint (e.g. 30 m) was a key predictor of both performance (4.04 [1.27, 6.79]) and potential scores (6.27 [2.90, 9.63]). Players with subjective performance and potential scores above 50 or 66 outperformed those below 50 or 66 in sprint, change of direction, and jumping performance. These findings highlight a strong link between subjective ratings and objective performance. An integrated approach combining both assessment types is crucial for talent development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2577487
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current performance and future potential of youth elite-level football players: Insights from both objective data and coach assessments

Johan Pion, Nikki Rommers, Laurens Gilson, Frederik Deconinck et al.
2 citations
Journal of Sports Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
article

Current performance and future potential of youth elite-level football players: Insights from both objective data and coach assessments

Johan Pion, Nikki Rommers, Laurens Gilson, Frederik Deconinck, Matthieu Lenoir, Eva D’Hondt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Football clubs use both objective and subjective assessments to continuously identify the most promising players and develop them towards professional athletes. This study investigated the associations between clubs' objective and subjective performance measures to gain a deeper understanding of their interplay. To this end, 331 elite youth football players (9 to 14 years) completed a test battery assessing anthropometry, physical performance, technical performance, and motor coordination. Additionally, coaches rated players' current performance and future potential using a visual analogue scale (0-100). Univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis with 95% confidence intervals were applied to explore associations between objective and subjective measures. A strong correlation emerged between performance and potential ratings (r = 0.70). Furthermore, faster sprint times, higher jumps, and better change of direction appeared to be associated with higher subjective ratings. The sprint (e.g. 30 m) was a key predictor of both performance (4.04 [1.27, 6.79]) and potential scores (6.27 [2.90, 9.63]). Players with subjective performance and potential scores above 50 or 66 outperformed those below 50 or 66 in sprint, change of direction, and jumping performance. These findings highlight a strong link between subjective ratings and objective performance. An integrated approach combining both assessment types is crucial for talent development.

Journal of Sports Sciences
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Basel (CH), Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sports Performance and Training
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.