On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of ΛCDM

ABSTRACT The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration, combining their baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data with cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy and supernovae data, have found significant indication against the Lambda cold dark matter ($\Lambda$CDM) cosmology. This can also be interpreted as the significance of the detection of the $w_a$ parameter that measures variation of the dark energy equation of state. DESI’s DR2 article quotes exclusion of $\Lambda$CDM for combinations of BAO and CMB data with each of three different and overlapping supernovae compilations (at 2.8σ for Pantheon+ , 3.8σ for Union3, and 4.2σ for DESY5). We show that one can neither choose amongst nor average over these three different significances. We demonstrate how a principled statistical combination yields a combined exclusion significance of 3.1σ. Further we argue that, faced with these competing significances, the most secure inference from the DESI DR2 results is the 3.1σ level exclusion of $\Lambda$CDM obtained from combining DESI + CMB alone, omitting supernovae.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaf108
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of ΛCDM

Marina Cortês, Andrew R. Liddle
10 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
15.04
article

On DESI’s DR2 exclusion of ΛCDM

Marina Cortês, Andrew R. Liddle
article en
10 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) collaboration, combining their baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data with cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy and supernovae data, have found significant indication against the Lambda cold dark matter ($\Lambda$CDM) cosmology. This can also be interpreted as the significance of the detection of the $w_a$ parameter that measures variation of the dark energy equation of state. DESI’s DR2 article quotes exclusion of $\Lambda$CDM for combinations of BAO and CMB data with each of three different and overlapping supernovae compilations (at 2.8σ for Pantheon+ , 3.8σ for Union3, and 4.2σ for DESY5). We show that one can neither choose amongst nor average over these three different significances. We demonstrate how a principled statistical combination yields a combined exclusion significance of 3.1σ. Further we argue that, faced with these competing significances, the most secure inference from the DESI DR2 results is the 3.1σ level exclusion of $\Lambda$CDM obtained from combining DESI + CMB alone, omitting supernovae.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society LettersVol. 544(1)
Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
15.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.