PATIENTS WITH ASSOCIATED SPINE OR OTHER MAJOR JOINT PAIN HAVE EQUIVALENT OUTCOMES TO PATIENTS WITH ISOLATED HIP PAIN AFTER HIP ARTHROSCOPY

Post-operative outcomes following hip arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can be assessed using a variety of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). It has recently been found that pain in other major joints, including the spine and knee, may negatively affect patient outcomes post-operatively. The objective of our study was to assess post-operative outcomes in patients treated arthroscopically for FAI and to determine whether presence of pain in other joints affects PRO scores pre- and post-operatively. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI between 2016–2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Patients were included if they had available pre-operative pain diagrams. Patients were then grouped into Musculoskeletal Morbidity (MSM) grades (Grade 1: hip pain only; Grade 2: hip and other major joint pain; Grade 3: hip and spine pain; Grade 4: hip, spine, and other major joint pain). Patients were excluded if they had: a history of ipsilateral hip surgery; <2 mm of joint space; and if they underwent an additional surgery other than the contralateral leg within 6 months of primary surgery. Primary outcomes included pre- and post-operative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). One hundred-seventeen patients were evaluated with a mean age of 37.16 years at the time of the surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was 31.5 months. Patients with MSM Grade 4 had significantly lower (i.e. worse) iHOT-33 scores (21.54±13.38) than MSM Grade 1 patients (40.07±20.97) at the pre-operative time point (p=0.006). Interestingly, all patients improved post-operatively (MSM 1–3 p<0.001; MSM 4 p=0.005). While MSM grade 4 patients had lower post-operative iHOT-33 scores (54.88±30.26) compared to Grades 1–3 (68.95±25.78, 68.28±28.99, 68.01±30.50, respectively). Treatment of FAI with hip arthroscopy yields improved iHOT-33 scores and patients with associated spine or other major joint pain have equivalent outcomes to patients with isolated hip pain. Patients with hip, spine, and other major joint pain have inferior outcomes compared with patients with MSM grade 1–3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.068
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PATIENTS WITH ASSOCIATED SPINE OR OTHER MAJOR JOINT PAIN HAVE EQUIVALENT OUTCOMES TO PATIENTS WITH ISOLATED HIP PAIN AFTER HIP ARTHROSCOPY

Ivan Wong, Sarah Remedios
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Hip disorders and treatments
article

PATIENTS WITH ASSOCIATED SPINE OR OTHER MAJOR JOINT PAIN HAVE EQUIVALENT OUTCOMES TO PATIENTS WITH ISOLATED HIP PAIN AFTER HIP ARTHROSCOPY

Ivan Wong, Sarah Remedios
article en

Abstract

Post-operative outcomes following hip arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can be assessed using a variety of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). It has recently been found that pain in other major joints, including the spine and knee, may negatively affect patient outcomes post-operatively. The objective of our study was to assess post-operative outcomes in patients treated arthroscopically for FAI and to determine whether presence of pain in other joints affects PRO scores pre- and post-operatively. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI between 2016–2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Patients were included if they had available pre-operative pain diagrams. Patients were then grouped into Musculoskeletal Morbidity (MSM) grades (Grade 1: hip pain only; Grade 2: hip and other major joint pain; Grade 3: hip and spine pain; Grade 4: hip, spine, and other major joint pain). Patients were excluded if they had: a history of ipsilateral hip surgery; <2 mm of joint space; and if they underwent an additional surgery other than the contralateral leg within 6 months of primary surgery. Primary outcomes included pre- and post-operative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). One hundred-seventeen patients were evaluated with a mean age of 37.16 years at the time of the surgery. The mean duration of follow-up was 31.5 months. Patients with MSM Grade 4 had significantly lower (i.e. worse) iHOT-33 scores (21.54±13.38) than MSM Grade 1 patients (40.07±20.97) at the pre-operative time point (p=0.006). Interestingly, all patients improved post-operatively (MSM 1–3 p<0.001; MSM 4 p=0.005). While MSM grade 4 patients had lower post-operative iHOT-33 scores (54.88±30.26) compared to Grades 1–3 (68.95±25.78, 68.28±28.99, 68.01±30.50, respectively). Treatment of FAI with hip arthroscopy yields improved iHOT-33 scores and patients with associated spine or other major joint pain have equivalent outcomes to patients with isolated hip pain. Patients with hip, spine, and other major joint pain have inferior outcomes compared with patients with MSM grade 1–3.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_10)
Nova Scotia Health Authority (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.