VIRTUAL REALITY FOR PATIENT-SPECIFIC MULTIDISCIPLINARY PLANNING OF COMPLEX ORTHOPAEDIC ONCOLOGICAL SURGERY

Surgical planning for complex orthopaedic oncology cases requires thorough understanding of anatomy and relationships to critical structures. Current imaging regimens include 2D planar CT and MRI, multiplanar reformations, 3D surface enhanced series and 3D printed models. However, Virtual Reality (VR) visualization and planning is a dynamic, immersive experience offering enhanced understanding of complex anatomical relationships, the ability manipulate and layer 3D models and images in real time and allows for multiple participants to engage simultaneously across remote sites. This pilot describes our initial experience with a novel VR planning system. Six patients with complex anatomic tumors were reviewed preoperatively by a multidisciplinary team of orthopaedic oncology surgeons, neurosurgeons, thoracic surgeons, spine surgeons along with a musculoskeletal radiologist. Interactive, on demand modelling of anatomical structures was performed in real time with input from all team members. Three cases involved the chest wall and spine and three cases arose from the pelvis. Pathology included Ewings sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and chondrosarcoma. Three-dimensional models of relevant bony and soft tissue anatomy were derived directly from diagnostic CT and MR imaging using 3D modeling tools in the virtual environment while noting the length of time and cost to prepare cases. The VR system was also validated for model and measurement accuracy via direct comparisons of with a reference system, and for overall ease of use and clinical utility. The Dice-Srensen Coefficient (DSC) was used to score similarity of models generated in VR to those made in the reference platform. On multidisciplinary debrief, each case reviewed in VR provided added information to the surgical team compared to standard imaging. This included better understanding of the tumor margins and relationships to critical structures and, in three cases, modified surgical approach. The platform successfully supported multiple reviewers sharing the same VR environment and allowed for dynamic changes to 2D and 3D visualizations. The mean time to prepare cases was 70 minutes (range 25 −90) dependent on number of anatomical structures to be modeled, representing a mean cost per case of $233 USD (range $85 −$300). DSC values for 3D structures created in VR were 0.97 or higher, confirming geometric accuracy of models relative to a reference system. Measurements of length, cross-sectional area, and angle on clinical CT scans were within 0.22 mm (0.3%), 0.16 mm2 (0.02%), and 0.04 deg (0.07%) or less of expected results, respectively. Lastly, pre-defined usability tests were successfully conducted by 15 volunteer end-users, all of whom yielded accurate measurements and models, and reported high confidence in their use of the platform. VR planning of complex multidisciplinary cases is dynamic, feasible and cost effective providing enhanced appreciation of complex anatomical relationships, leading to increased surgeon confidence and impacting on surgical approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.105
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VIRTUAL REALITY FOR PATIENT-SPECIFIC MULTIDISCIPLINARY PLANNING OF COMPLEX ORTHOPAEDIC ONCOLOGICAL SURGERY

TE Flaxman, Paul J. Villeneuve, Adam Sachs, Hesham Abdelbary et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

VIRTUAL REALITY FOR PATIENT-SPECIFIC MULTIDISCIPLINARY PLANNING OF COMPLEX ORTHOPAEDIC ONCOLOGICAL SURGERY

TE Flaxman, Paul J. Villeneuve, Adam Sachs, Hesham Abdelbary, Philippe Phan, Joel Werier, Kevin Smit, Kawan Rakhra, Jorge Cabrolier, Y. Al Mosuli
article en

Abstract

Surgical planning for complex orthopaedic oncology cases requires thorough understanding of anatomy and relationships to critical structures. Current imaging regimens include 2D planar CT and MRI, multiplanar reformations, 3D surface enhanced series and 3D printed models. However, Virtual Reality (VR) visualization and planning is a dynamic, immersive experience offering enhanced understanding of complex anatomical relationships, the ability manipulate and layer 3D models and images in real time and allows for multiple participants to engage simultaneously across remote sites. This pilot describes our initial experience with a novel VR planning system. Six patients with complex anatomic tumors were reviewed preoperatively by a multidisciplinary team of orthopaedic oncology surgeons, neurosurgeons, thoracic surgeons, spine surgeons along with a musculoskeletal radiologist. Interactive, on demand modelling of anatomical structures was performed in real time with input from all team members. Three cases involved the chest wall and spine and three cases arose from the pelvis. Pathology included Ewings sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and chondrosarcoma. Three-dimensional models of relevant bony and soft tissue anatomy were derived directly from diagnostic CT and MR imaging using 3D modeling tools in the virtual environment while noting the length of time and cost to prepare cases. The VR system was also validated for model and measurement accuracy via direct comparisons of with a reference system, and for overall ease of use and clinical utility. The Dice-Srensen Coefficient (DSC) was used to score similarity of models generated in VR to those made in the reference platform. On multidisciplinary debrief, each case reviewed in VR provided added information to the surgical team compared to standard imaging. This included better understanding of the tumor margins and relationships to critical structures and, in three cases, modified surgical approach. The platform successfully supported multiple reviewers sharing the same VR environment and allowed for dynamic changes to 2D and 3D visualizations. The mean time to prepare cases was 70 minutes (range 25 −90) dependent on number of anatomical structures to be modeled, representing a mean cost per case of $233 USD (range $85 −$300). DSC values for 3D structures created in VR were 0.97 or higher, confirming geometric accuracy of models relative to a reference system. Measurements of length, cross-sectional area, and angle on clinical CT scans were within 0.22 mm (0.3%), 0.16 mm2 (0.02%), and 0.04 deg (0.07%) or less of expected results, respectively. Lastly, pre-defined usability tests were successfully conducted by 15 volunteer end-users, all of whom yielded accurate measurements and models, and reported high confidence in their use of the platform. VR planning of complex multidisciplinary cases is dynamic, feasible and cost effective providing enhanced appreciation of complex anatomical relationships, leading to increased surgeon confidence and impacting on surgical approach.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_10)
Ottawa Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.