INEQUITIES IN ACCESS TO ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION AND TIME TO SURGERY BASED ON SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS: A PROVINCIAL COHORT STUDY

A limited but growing pool of evidence from orthopaedic literature suggests that inequalities persist in health care systems around the world. A primarily publicly funded health care system such as there is in Canada should ideally help to modulate these inequalities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of socioeconomic status (SES) on availability and timing of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery based on the Manitoba experience. A retrospective population-based study was conducted using data assembled through the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP). A comparison of patients that underwent ACLR and those that were diagnosed with an ACL injury by a surgeon but did not proceed to surgery was conducted (2015–2020). Time from primary care physician diagnosis to orthopaedic consult (time to consult) and time from consult to surgery (time to surgery) were also evaluated with respect to SES for patients (1990–2020). Logistic regression was performed using surgery as the dependent and SES as the independent variable. SES was operationally defined using the Socioeconomic Status Factor Index-2, a factor value established by MCHP that takes into account average household income, percent of single parent households, unemployment rate for those 15 years or older, and rate of high school education based on postal code. SEFI-2 scores range from −5 to +5 with lower scores being more positive SES. Logistic regression was also performed using time to surgery of more or less than a year as the dependent variable. From 2015 to 2020, 1454 patients underwent ACLR in Manitoba compared to 915, with the same diagnostic codes given by the surgeon, who did not. The mean SEFI-2 score for those that underwent ACLR was −0.28 (95% CI 0.04) and for those that did not it was −0.005 (95% CI −0.07; p < 0 .001). The odds ratio for those with a score greater than +1 of undergoing ACLR was 0.37 (95% CI 0.12; p < 0 .001) and between 0 and +1 was 0.60 (95% CI 0.15; p < 0 .001) compared to other SEFI-2 score levels. Of the 7,868 patients that underwent ACLR between 1990 and 2020, only 6% were in the lowest SES category compared to 16% in the highest (Figure 1). Mean time to consult was 0.71 (95% CI 0.05) years and mean time to surgery from consult was 0.54 (95% CI 0.03). The odds of those in the lowest SES category having their surgical consult within 1 year of diagnosis was not different than those in other categories (0.77 (95% CI 0.20) years; p=0.09). The odds of having surgery within 1 year of consult was significant (0.72 (95% CI 0.18) years; p=0.02). Patients of lower SES were less likely to undergo ACLR compared to those of higher SES. Furthermore, patients of lower economic status were less likely to have their surgery within 1 year of initial consultation. There was no difference in time from initial diagnosis by a primary care physician to surgical consult. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.134
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INEQUITIES IN ACCESS TO ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION AND TIME TO SURGERY BASED ON SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS: A PROVINCIAL COHORT STUDY

Jarret M. Woodmass, Heather J. Prior, Marc Morissette, Sheila McRae et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

INEQUITIES IN ACCESS TO ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION AND TIME TO SURGERY BASED ON SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS: A PROVINCIAL COHORT STUDY

Jarret M. Woodmass, Heather J. Prior, Marc Morissette, Sheila McRae, P.B. MacDonald, M. Fowler-Woods, M. Dawdy
article en

Abstract

A limited but growing pool of evidence from orthopaedic literature suggests that inequalities persist in health care systems around the world. A primarily publicly funded health care system such as there is in Canada should ideally help to modulate these inequalities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of socioeconomic status (SES) on availability and timing of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery based on the Manitoba experience. A retrospective population-based study was conducted using data assembled through the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP). A comparison of patients that underwent ACLR and those that were diagnosed with an ACL injury by a surgeon but did not proceed to surgery was conducted (2015–2020). Time from primary care physician diagnosis to orthopaedic consult (time to consult) and time from consult to surgery (time to surgery) were also evaluated with respect to SES for patients (1990–2020). Logistic regression was performed using surgery as the dependent and SES as the independent variable. SES was operationally defined using the Socioeconomic Status Factor Index-2, a factor value established by MCHP that takes into account average household income, percent of single parent households, unemployment rate for those 15 years or older, and rate of high school education based on postal code. SEFI-2 scores range from −5 to +5 with lower scores being more positive SES. Logistic regression was also performed using time to surgery of more or less than a year as the dependent variable. From 2015 to 2020, 1454 patients underwent ACLR in Manitoba compared to 915, with the same diagnostic codes given by the surgeon, who did not. The mean SEFI-2 score for those that underwent ACLR was −0.28 (95% CI 0.04) and for those that did not it was −0.005 (95% CI −0.07; p < 0 .001). The odds ratio for those with a score greater than +1 of undergoing ACLR was 0.37 (95% CI 0.12; p < 0 .001) and between 0 and +1 was 0.60 (95% CI 0.15; p < 0 .001) compared to other SEFI-2 score levels. Of the 7,868 patients that underwent ACLR between 1990 and 2020, only 6% were in the lowest SES category compared to 16% in the highest (Figure 1). Mean time to consult was 0.71 (95% CI 0.05) years and mean time to surgery from consult was 0.54 (95% CI 0.03). The odds of those in the lowest SES category having their surgical consult within 1 year of diagnosis was not different than those in other categories (0.77 (95% CI 0.20) years; p=0.09). The odds of having surgery within 1 year of consult was significant (0.72 (95% CI 0.18) years; p=0.02). Patients of lower SES were less likely to undergo ACLR compared to those of higher SES. Furthermore, patients of lower economic status were less likely to have their surgery within 1 year of initial consultation. There was no difference in time from initial diagnosis by a primary care physician to surgical consult. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.