Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Waste Heterogeneity and Recycling Pathways: Evaluating Mechanical and Chemical Recycling Technologies in the Context of the Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Supply Chain

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is a common thermoplastic used in a variety of applications. PET is one of the most highly recycled plastics, and mechanical recycling of PET bottles has been practiced for over 30 years, with large and robust collection and processing supply chains. Even with this success, there are challenges and opportunities to improve PET bottle recycling. Other PET materials, such as textiles, the largest PET end use, are not compatible with the existing mechanical recycling technologies. Development and improvement of PET recycling technology are necessary to expand the scope of recyclable wastes, such as textiles, and improve the circularity and sustainability of PET as a material. A detailed understanding is required of PET products and compositional characteristics, and how they influence the characteristics and composition of PET waste. This needs to complement an understanding of the technological nuances of different PET recycling technologies that cause processing or reliability limitations and provide fundamental advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this work is to tie together the product and compositional variation of PET products and PET waste feedstocks to the fundamentals of different recycling pathways to determine the advantages and limitations of current and developing technologies. Mechanical recycling technologies should be used to the broadest extent possible, but purification limitations related to mechanical recycling reduce the scope of recyclable material to heavily sorted or monocollected, clear feedstocks, requiring support from upstream supply chain improvements and design-for-circularity initiatives. Chemical recycling pathways provide a way to considerably expand the scope of recoverable PET waste by enabling purification capabilities at a molecular level. Separations and purification capabilities are the primary factors impacting the energy demand and complexity of chemical recycling technologies. The development of consistent and reliable supply chains for the collection of polyester textile waste encourages the investment and development of large-scale textile-based chemical recycling plants. Understanding the material quality and compositional variance of textile waste in the supply chain is necessary to tailor the design of chemical recycling processes to specific types of waste, which further improves the efficiency and economics. Identification of processing issues or inefficiencies in recycling low-quality waste motivates changes in product design or collection, which further reduce recycling costs and improve recycling efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02479
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Waste Heterogeneity and Recycling Pathways: Evaluating Mechanical and Chemical Recycling Technologies in the Context of the Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Supply Chain

Adam McNeeley, Kiyan Vadoudi, Y. A. Liu
3 citations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
2.99
article

Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Waste Heterogeneity and Recycling Pathways: Evaluating Mechanical and Chemical Recycling Technologies in the Context of the Poly(ethylene Terephthalate) Supply Chain

Adam McNeeley, Kiyan Vadoudi, Y. A. Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is a common thermoplastic used in a variety of applications. PET is one of the most highly recycled plastics, and mechanical recycling of PET bottles has been practiced for over 30 years, with large and robust collection and processing supply chains. Even with this success, there are challenges and opportunities to improve PET bottle recycling. Other PET materials, such as textiles, the largest PET end use, are not compatible with the existing mechanical recycling technologies. Development and improvement of PET recycling technology are necessary to expand the scope of recyclable wastes, such as textiles, and improve the circularity and sustainability of PET as a material. A detailed understanding is required of PET products and compositional characteristics, and how they influence the characteristics and composition of PET waste. This needs to complement an understanding of the technological nuances of different PET recycling technologies that cause processing or reliability limitations and provide fundamental advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this work is to tie together the product and compositional variation of PET products and PET waste feedstocks to the fundamentals of different recycling pathways to determine the advantages and limitations of current and developing technologies. Mechanical recycling technologies should be used to the broadest extent possible, but purification limitations related to mechanical recycling reduce the scope of recyclable material to heavily sorted or monocollected, clear feedstocks, requiring support from upstream supply chain improvements and design-for-circularity initiatives. Chemical recycling pathways provide a way to considerably expand the scope of recoverable PET waste by enabling purification capabilities at a molecular level. Separations and purification capabilities are the primary factors impacting the energy demand and complexity of chemical recycling technologies. The development of consistent and reliable supply chains for the collection of polyester textile waste encourages the investment and development of large-scale textile-based chemical recycling plants. Understanding the material quality and compositional variance of textile waste in the supply chain is necessary to tailor the design of chemical recycling processes to specific types of waste, which further improves the efficiency and economics. Identification of processing issues or inefficiencies in recycling low-quality waste motivates changes in product design or collection, which further reduce recycling costs and improve recycling efficiency.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 64(44)
AspenTech (United States) (US), Université Clermont Auvergne (FR), Institut de Chimie de Clermont-Ferrand (FR), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
2.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.