The impact of warm-up intensity and duration on maximal effort limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters in healthy young adults
The impact of warm-up protocols on peak oxygen uptake (V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of warm-ups of different durations and intensities on V̇o<sub>2peak</sub> in healthy young adults during maximal-effort CPET cycle ergometry. Recreationally active participants (10 males, 4 females; 27 ± 4 yr) performed five CPETs, each preceded by one of five randomized conditions: <i>1</i>) no warm-up (NWU), <i>2</i>) short-duration/low-intensity (SD/LI) warm-up (5 min at 0.5 W·kg<sup>-1</sup>), <i>3</i>) long-duration/low-intensity (LD/LI) warm-up (10 min at 0.5 W·kg<sup>-1</sup>), <i>4</i>) short-duration/moderate-intensity (SD/MI) warm-up (5 min at 1 W·kg<sup>-1</sup>), and <i>5</i>) a long-duration/moderate-intensity (LD/MI) warm-up (10 min at 1 W·kg<sup>-1</sup>). No significant differences were found in V̇o<sub>2peak</sub>, peak heart rate, maximal, or submaximal power output across the different warm-up protocols (<i>P</i> > 0.05 for all comparisons), except for greater absolute HR and power output observed at the first ventilatory threshold (VT1) following SD/MI versus NWU (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Participant ratings of warm-up protocols indicated a preference for shorter- and/or lower-intensity warm-ups. Among healthy young adults, the inclusion of warm-up exercise before CPET has no significant effects on maximal exercise parameters. These findings question the necessity of warm-up before CPET and provide flexibility in CPET warm-up protocol selection in this population. Recapitulation of this study in alternative clinical and scientific populations is warranted.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The impact of warm-up intensity and duration before maximal effort cardiopulmonary exercise testing remains uncertain. Herein, we investigated the effect of a 5- versus 10-min warm-up performed at low or moderate intensity on maximal oxygen consumption. Compared with no warm-up, these different warm-ups yielded similar peak oxygen uptake, peak heart rate, and peak power output, thereby challenging the conventional notion that a warm-up is needed to optimize cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Authors
- Davide Malatesta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3905-5642)
- Vincent Grémeaux
- William E. Kraus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1930-9684)
- Daria Neyroud (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-802X)
- Bruna Rafaele Vieira PEDROSA (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4246-4885)
- Fabio Borrani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7672-3307)
- Aaron L. Baggish (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2042-1489)
- Chantal Daucourt
- Brian D. Duscha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3257-6157)
- Brian J. Coyne (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9305-6473)
Institutions
- Duke University (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- University of Lausanne (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Published
- 2025-10-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00774.2025
- Primary Topic
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00