Enhanced methanol synthesis via CO₂ hydrogenation under mild conditions: Tailoring Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts through precursor selection for optimized Cu-ZnO interface interaction

Methanol synthesis via CO₂ hydrogenation is a promising route for sustainable chemical production, providing an alternative to fossil-based methanol. In this study, Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ (CZA) catalysts were synthesized via wet co-impregnation using different Cu and ZnO precursor salts (nitrate, acetate, and chloride) to investigate their impact on catalytic performance. Characterization by BET, XRD, Raman spectroscopy, UV–Vis DRS, TPR, XPS, FESEM, and STEM revealed significant differences in Cu dispersion, metal-support interaction, and Cu phase distribution. CO₂ hydrogenation tests were conducted over a temperature range of 180–350 °C and a pressure range of 1–7 bar to evaluate methanol selectivity and productivity. Characterization results showed that CZA_nitrate exhibited the strongest Cu/ZnO interaction and the highest Cu/ZnO interface content, evidenced by a prominent Cu 2+ /ZnO charge transfer band in UV–Vis DRS, a lower-temperature reduction peak in TPR, and Cu species quantification at the Cu/ZnO interface via TPR. In contrast, CZA_chloride had significantly lower Cu/ZnO interface content, as confirmed by TPR peak deconvolution, and exhibited CuAl₂O₄ species formation (evidenced also by Raman and XRD), which hindered Cu-ZnO interactions. Among the catalysts tested, CZA_nitrate demonstrated the best catalytic performance, achieving 100 % methanol selectivity at 180–200 °C under atmospheric pressure along with the highest methanol productivity. A strong correlation between Cu/ZnO interface content and methanol productivity was further validated by linear regression analysis. Stability tests confirmed that CZA_nitrate maintained high performance over time, whereas CZA_chloride deactivated due to coke formation, likely caused by CuAl₂O₄ phases limiting Cu/ZnO synergy. Comparison with a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst (CZA_commercial) revealed that while both catalysts were active, CZA_nitrate significantly outperformed the commercial catalyst, achieving higher methanol selectivity (100 % vs. 23 %) at WHSV of 10 h −1 , and 1 bar. At elevated pressures (up to 7 bar), methanol selectivity remained high at lower temperatures, while at 250 °C, increased pressure mitigated RWGS side reactions, enhancing selectivity. Methane formation remained negligible across all conditions, confirming that the primary side reaction was the RWGS reaction. A comparison with literature data demonstrated that CZA_nitrate outperformed previously reported Cu-based catalysts at atmospheric pressure, achieving superior methanol selectivity even at low temperatures (180–200 °C). This study highlights CZA_nitrate as an optimized catalyst for CO₂ hydrogenation and emphasizes the crucial role of precursor selection in designing highly efficient Cu-based catalysts for selective CO₂ conversion to methanol. • Optimized Cu/ZnO interface boosts methanol production from CO₂ hydrogenation. • CZA_nitrate catalyst outperforms commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ in methanol selectivity. • Precursor salts strongly influence Cu dispersion, affecting catalytic performance. • CuAl₂O₄ phase in CZA_chloride limits activity and promotes catalyst deactivation. • High pressure boosts CO₂ conversion on CZA_nitrate, keeping 50 % methanol selectivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.169870
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced methanol synthesis via CO₂ hydrogenation under mild conditions: Tailoring Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts through precursor selection for optimized Cu-ZnO interface interaction

Serena Esposito, Giuseppina Iervolino, M. Fontana, Micaela Castellino et al.
2 citations
Chemical Engineering Journal
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.78
article

Enhanced methanol synthesis via CO₂ hydrogenation under mild conditions: Tailoring Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts through precursor selection for optimized Cu-ZnO interface interaction

Serena Esposito, Giuseppina Iervolino, M. Fontana, Micaela Castellino, Vincenzo Vaiano, Rosanna Viscardi, Vincenzo Palma, Gianluca Landi, Claudia Bassano, Anthony C. Muscatello, Laura Chianese, Stefano Scognamiglio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Methanol synthesis via CO₂ hydrogenation is a promising route for sustainable chemical production, providing an alternative to fossil-based methanol. In this study, Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ (CZA) catalysts were synthesized via wet co-impregnation using different Cu and ZnO precursor salts (nitrate, acetate, and chloride) to investigate their impact on catalytic performance. Characterization by BET, XRD, Raman spectroscopy, UV–Vis DRS, TPR, XPS, FESEM, and STEM revealed significant differences in Cu dispersion, metal-support interaction, and Cu phase distribution. CO₂ hydrogenation tests were conducted over a temperature range of 180–350 °C and a pressure range of 1–7 bar to evaluate methanol selectivity and productivity. Characterization results showed that CZA_nitrate exhibited the strongest Cu/ZnO interaction and the highest Cu/ZnO interface content, evidenced by a prominent Cu 2+ /ZnO charge transfer band in UV–Vis DRS, a lower-temperature reduction peak in TPR, and Cu species quantification at the Cu/ZnO interface via TPR. In contrast, CZA_chloride had significantly lower Cu/ZnO interface content, as confirmed by TPR peak deconvolution, and exhibited CuAl₂O₄ species formation (evidenced also by Raman and XRD), which hindered Cu-ZnO interactions. Among the catalysts tested, CZA_nitrate demonstrated the best catalytic performance, achieving 100 % methanol selectivity at 180–200 °C under atmospheric pressure along with the highest methanol productivity. A strong correlation between Cu/ZnO interface content and methanol productivity was further validated by linear regression analysis. Stability tests confirmed that CZA_nitrate maintained high performance over time, whereas CZA_chloride deactivated due to coke formation, likely caused by CuAl₂O₄ phases limiting Cu/ZnO synergy. Comparison with a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst (CZA_commercial) revealed that while both catalysts were active, CZA_nitrate significantly outperformed the commercial catalyst, achieving higher methanol selectivity (100 % vs. 23 %) at WHSV of 10 h −1 , and 1 bar. At elevated pressures (up to 7 bar), methanol selectivity remained high at lower temperatures, while at 250 °C, increased pressure mitigated RWGS side reactions, enhancing selectivity. Methane formation remained negligible across all conditions, confirming that the primary side reaction was the RWGS reaction. A comparison with literature data demonstrated that CZA_nitrate outperformed previously reported Cu-based catalysts at atmospheric pressure, achieving superior methanol selectivity even at low temperatures (180–200 °C). This study highlights CZA_nitrate as an optimized catalyst for CO₂ hydrogenation and emphasizes the crucial role of precursor selection in designing highly efficient Cu-based catalysts for selective CO₂ conversion to methanol. • Optimized Cu/ZnO interface boosts methanol production from CO₂ hydrogenation. • CZA_nitrate catalyst outperforms commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ in methanol selectivity. • Precursor salts strongly influence Cu dispersion, affecting catalytic performance. • CuAl₂O₄ phase in CZA_chloride limits activity and promotes catalyst deactivation. • High pressure boosts CO₂ conversion on CZA_nitrate, keeping 50 % methanol selectivity.

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 525
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), University of Salerno (IT), Politecnico di Torino (IT), Tecnologie Avanzate (Italy) (IT), Center for Sustainable Future Technologies (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.