Dynamic response to a porous seabed and the associated liquefaction around a piggyback pipeline system

Seabed liquefaction induced by simultaneous wave and current loads poses significant threats to the stability of offshore infrastructures such as piggyback pipelines. This work focuses on an integrated numerical model (PORO-FSSI-FOAM) that couples OlaFlow solver with Biot's poro-elastic theory is employed to investigate soil response around piggyback pipeline systems subjected to wave-current loading. Validation of the present model against previous experimental measurements reveals consistent agreement for the distribution of wave-induced pore pressures in the vicinity of the pipe. Parametric studies examine the influences of pipeline configuration on seabed liquefaction. The numerical results reveal that piggyback pipelines generate more pronounced vortex patterns than single pipelines, leading to enhanced pressure gradients in the seabed. The spacing ratio G / D = 0.2 consistently produces the maximum pore pressure amplitudes and liquefaction depth ratios under all wave conditions. The diameter ratio d / D = 0.3 emerges as the most critical configuration, creating substantial velocity gradients and enhanced seabed instability. The analysis of position angle demonstrates that the placement of the auxiliary pipeline at α = 0 ∘ or 180 ∘ significantly increases the depths of liquefaction compared to the single pipeline system, attributed to leaking of pore water seepage pathways. The wave height exerts the most pronounced influence on the liquefaction potential across all pipeline configurations, while the wave period shows minimal sensitivity. • The piggyback pipelines generate enhanced vortex patterns compared to a single pipe. • The spacing ratio G / D = 0.2 produces the maximum depth of liquefaction under waves. • Diameter ratio d / D = 0.3 emerges as the most critical configuration for instability. • Position angles α = 0 ∘ or 180 ∘ increase liquefaction through the seepage paths. • The wave height affects liquefaction, while the wave period shows minimal impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107861
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic response to a porous seabed and the associated liquefaction around a piggyback pipeline system

Xu Chen, Dong‐Sheng Jeng
Results in Engineering
Underwater Acoustics Research
article

Dynamic response to a porous seabed and the associated liquefaction around a piggyback pipeline system

Xu Chen, Dong‐Sheng Jeng
article en

Abstract

Seabed liquefaction induced by simultaneous wave and current loads poses significant threats to the stability of offshore infrastructures such as piggyback pipelines. This work focuses on an integrated numerical model (PORO-FSSI-FOAM) that couples OlaFlow solver with Biot's poro-elastic theory is employed to investigate soil response around piggyback pipeline systems subjected to wave-current loading. Validation of the present model against previous experimental measurements reveals consistent agreement for the distribution of wave-induced pore pressures in the vicinity of the pipe. Parametric studies examine the influences of pipeline configuration on seabed liquefaction. The numerical results reveal that piggyback pipelines generate more pronounced vortex patterns than single pipelines, leading to enhanced pressure gradients in the seabed. The spacing ratio G / D = 0.2 consistently produces the maximum pore pressure amplitudes and liquefaction depth ratios under all wave conditions. The diameter ratio d / D = 0.3 emerges as the most critical configuration, creating substantial velocity gradients and enhanced seabed instability. The analysis of position angle demonstrates that the placement of the auxiliary pipeline at α = 0 ∘ or 180 ∘ significantly increases the depths of liquefaction compared to the single pipeline system, attributed to leaking of pore water seepage pathways. The wave height exerts the most pronounced influence on the liquefaction potential across all pipeline configurations, while the wave period shows minimal sensitivity. • The piggyback pipelines generate enhanced vortex patterns compared to a single pipe. • The spacing ratio G / D = 0.2 produces the maximum depth of liquefaction under waves. • Diameter ratio d / D = 0.3 emerges as the most critical configuration for instability. • Position angles α = 0 ∘ or 180 ∘ increase liquefaction through the seepage paths. • The wave height affects liquefaction, while the wave period shows minimal impact.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Griffith University (AU), Qingdao University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Underwater Acoustics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.