Fast, Fine-Grained Equivalence Checking for Neural Decompilers

Neural decompilers are machine learning models that reconstruct the source code from an executable program. Critical to the lifecycle of any machine learning model is an evaluation of its effectiveness. However, existing techniques for evaluating neural decompilation models are generally inadequate, especially when it comes to showing the correctness of the neural decompiler's predictions. To address this, we introduce codealign , 1 a novel instruction-level code equivalence technique designed for neural decompilers. We provide a formal definition of a relation between equivalent instructions, which we term an equivalence alignment. We show how codealign generates equivalence alignments, then evaluate codealign by comparing it with symbolic execution. Finally, we show how the information codealign provides—which parts of the functions are equivalent and how well the variable names match—is substantially more detailed than existing state-of-the-art evaluation metrics, which report unitless numbers measuring similarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772368
Primary Topic
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast, Fine-Grained Equivalence Checking for Neural Decompilers

Claire Le Goues, Edward J. Schwartz, Luke Dramko
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
article

Fast, Fine-Grained Equivalence Checking for Neural Decompilers

Claire Le Goues, Edward J. Schwartz, Luke Dramko
article en

Abstract

Neural decompilers are machine learning models that reconstruct the source code from an executable program. Critical to the lifecycle of any machine learning model is an evaluation of its effectiveness. However, existing techniques for evaluating neural decompilation models are generally inadequate, especially when it comes to showing the correctness of the neural decompiler's predictions. To address this, we introduce codealign , 1 a novel instruction-level code equivalence technique designed for neural decompilers. We provide a formal definition of a relation between equivalent instructions, which we term an equivalence alignment. We show how codealign generates equivalence alignments, then evaluate codealign by comparing it with symbolic execution. Finally, we show how the information codealign provides—which parts of the functions are equivalent and how well the variable names match—is substantially more detailed than existing state-of-the-art evaluation metrics, which report unitless numbers measuring similarity.

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Software Engineering Institute (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fast, Fine-Grained Equivalence Checking for Neural Decompilers — Claire Le Goues, Edward J. Schwartz, et al. · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS