American Heart Association blood pressure classification and subsequent risk of preeclampsia

Abstract Background In 2017, the American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology updated their hypertension guidelines for the nonpregnant population, lowering the diagnostic thresholds to systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg. This reclassification has raised important questions regarding whether blood pressure (BP) values previously considered within the normal range in pregnancy may, in fact, confer an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs). Objective To evaluate the association between first‐trimester BP classified by AHA thresholds and the subsequent development of HDPs. Study design This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolling singleton pregnancies at ≤13 6/7 weeks’ gestation. Participants with preexisting hypertension were excluded. First‐trimester BP was categorized using AHA guidelines: normal (<120/80 mmHg), elevated (120–129/<80 mmHg), Stage 1 hypertension (130–139/80–89 mmHg), and Stage 2 hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg). The primary outcome was preeclampsia; secondary outcomes included gestational hypertension and HDPs. Associations were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, parity, race, smoking status, and preeclampsia risk factors. Predictive performance was assessed using concordance indices. Results Among 576 participants, 13.0% developed HDP, including 7.6% with preeclampsia. Incidence of preeclampsia increased stepwise with AHA BP category: 4.8% (normal), 11.2% (elevated), 14.6% (Stage 1), and 16.7% (Stage 2) ( p < 0.001). Compared to normal BP, adjusted hazard ratios for preeclampsia were 2.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–4.86) for elevated BP, 2.80 (95% CI, 1.38–5.67) for Stage 1, and 2.48 (95% CI, 0.32–19.01) for Stage 2. AHA‐based models outperformed American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) thresholds (≥140/90 mmHg) in predicting HDP ( C ‐index, 0.71 vs. 0.65; p < 0.05). Conclusion First‐trimester BP classification using AHA guidelines offers a more nuanced approach to stratifying HDP risk in pregnancy, enabling earlier identification of at‐risk individuals beyond the current ACOG definition of chronic hypertension in pregnancy, and supporting more personalized counseling and preventive strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70124
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

American Heart Association blood pressure classification and subsequent risk of preeclampsia

Elena Sinkovskaya, Rebecca Horgan, Alfred Abuhamad, Erkan Kalafat et al.
Pregnancy
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

American Heart Association blood pressure classification and subsequent risk of preeclampsia

Elena Sinkovskaya, Rebecca Horgan, Alfred Abuhamad, Erkan Kalafat, George R. Saade
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In 2017, the American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology updated their hypertension guidelines for the nonpregnant population, lowering the diagnostic thresholds to systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg. This reclassification has raised important questions regarding whether blood pressure (BP) values previously considered within the normal range in pregnancy may, in fact, confer an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs). Objective To evaluate the association between first‐trimester BP classified by AHA thresholds and the subsequent development of HDPs. Study design This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter cohort study enrolling singleton pregnancies at ≤13 6/7 weeks’ gestation. Participants with preexisting hypertension were excluded. First‐trimester BP was categorized using AHA guidelines: normal (<120/80 mmHg), elevated (120–129/<80 mmHg), Stage 1 hypertension (130–139/80–89 mmHg), and Stage 2 hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg). The primary outcome was preeclampsia; secondary outcomes included gestational hypertension and HDPs. Associations were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, parity, race, smoking status, and preeclampsia risk factors. Predictive performance was assessed using concordance indices. Results Among 576 participants, 13.0% developed HDP, including 7.6% with preeclampsia. Incidence of preeclampsia increased stepwise with AHA BP category: 4.8% (normal), 11.2% (elevated), 14.6% (Stage 1), and 16.7% (Stage 2) ( p < 0.001). Compared to normal BP, adjusted hazard ratios for preeclampsia were 2.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–4.86) for elevated BP, 2.80 (95% CI, 1.38–5.67) for Stage 1, and 2.48 (95% CI, 0.32–19.01) for Stage 2. AHA‐based models outperformed American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) thresholds (≥140/90 mmHg) in predicting HDP ( C ‐index, 0.71 vs. 0.65; p < 0.05). Conclusion First‐trimester BP classification using AHA guidelines offers a more nuanced approach to stratifying HDP risk in pregnancy, enabling earlier identification of at‐risk individuals beyond the current ACOG definition of chronic hypertension in pregnancy, and supporting more personalized counseling and preventive strategies.

PregnancyVol. 1(6)
Koç University (TR), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.