Comparison of two quality-of-life questionnaires in cochlear implanted children

The present cross-sectional study compared efficacy between two quality-of-life questionnaires for cochlear implanted children: CIQOL-10 Global and PEACH. Forty cochlear implanted children, aged 18 months to 15 years, were included over a 3-month period. Children not wearing the implant, from non-French-speaking families, with psychomotor retardation or neurologic deficit were excluded. Ease of filling out the questionnaires and their relevance were assessed on Visual Analog Scales. The aim was to select the questionnaire better adapted to an implanted pediatric population. PEACH scored significantly better than CIQOL for ease of use and relevance, particularly for under-6 year-olds. On average, 3 of the 10 CIQOL questions went unanswered for children aged≤6 years, versus just 1 out of 13 for PEACH. PEACH, being easier to answer and more relevant, particularly for younger children, can optimize follow-up of cochlear implanted children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2025.10.006
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of two quality-of-life questionnaires in cochlear implanted children

N. Noël‐Pétroff, T. Van Den Abbeele, E. Bois, C Chandrakumar et al.
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Comparison of two quality-of-life questionnaires in cochlear implanted children

N. Noël‐Pétroff, T. Van Den Abbeele, E. Bois, C Chandrakumar, F-X Bétolaud, T Deray
article en

Abstract

The present cross-sectional study compared efficacy between two quality-of-life questionnaires for cochlear implanted children: CIQOL-10 Global and PEACH. Forty cochlear implanted children, aged 18 months to 15 years, were included over a 3-month period. Children not wearing the implant, from non-French-speaking families, with psychomotor retardation or neurologic deficit were excluded. Ease of filling out the questionnaires and their relevance were assessed on Visual Analog Scales. The aim was to select the questionnaire better adapted to an implanted pediatric population. PEACH scored significantly better than CIQOL for ease of use and relevance, particularly for under-6 year-olds. On average, 3 of the 10 CIQOL questions went unanswered for children aged≤6 years, versus just 1 out of 13 for PEACH. PEACH, being easier to answer and more relevant, particularly for younger children, can optimize follow-up of cochlear implanted children.

European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck DiseasesVol. 143(2)
Hôpital Robert-Debré (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of two quality-of-life questionnaires in cochlear implanted children — N. Noël‐Pétroff, T. Van Den Abbeele, et al. · European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS