How Should We Study Heterogeneity in Entrepreneurship? Moving the Field to an Inclusive Approach

Entrepreneurship scholarship faces challenges related to diverse populations, striving to balance inclusivity with the recognition of unique entrepreneurial identities. Applying optimal distinctiveness theory, we explore the relationship between belongingness and uniqueness in entrepreneurship research. Catalyzed by Bakker and McMullen’s 2023 article on inclusivity in entrepreneurship, we utilized natural language processing to examine responses about inclusive entrepreneurship from 29 scholars dedicated to marginalized populations. Findings suggest that employing varied research methods and integrating structural and epistemological considerations can enhance our understanding of entrepreneurial heterogeneity. We advocate for entrepreneurship research that values individual experiences while promoting inclusive practices, highlighting the need for evolving scholarly paradigms to reflect entrepreneurial differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587251347048
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Should We Study Heterogeneity in Entrepreneurship? Moving the Field to an Inclusive Approach

Haya Al‐Dajani, Friederike Welter, Florence Villesèche, Rosanna Garcia et al.
4 citations
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
11.04
article

How Should We Study Heterogeneity in Entrepreneurship? Moving the Field to an Inclusive Approach

Haya Al‐Dajani, Friederike Welter, Florence Villesèche, Rosanna Garcia, Arielle Badger Newman, Karin Berglund, Cathy Yang Liu, Miruna Radu-Lefebvre, Angela F. Randolph, José Ernesto Amorós, Laura Galloway, Anne de Bruin, Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd, Jessica Lindbergh, Anna Wettermark, Eunki Ro, Mirela Xheneti, Rachel Atkins, Birgitta Schwartz, Jan Keim, Christina Lubinski, Diana Hechavarria, Jay O’Toole, Gregory N. Price, Alexander Lewis, Candida G. Brush, Debora Jackson, Monder Ram, Pascal Dey, William B. Gartner, Ezekiel Bonillas, Anil Nair, R. Daniel Wadhwani, Tabitha Sindani
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Entrepreneurship scholarship faces challenges related to diverse populations, striving to balance inclusivity with the recognition of unique entrepreneurial identities. Applying optimal distinctiveness theory, we explore the relationship between belongingness and uniqueness in entrepreneurship research. Catalyzed by Bakker and McMullen’s 2023 article on inclusivity in entrepreneurship, we utilized natural language processing to examine responses about inclusive entrepreneurship from 29 scholars dedicated to marginalized populations. Findings suggest that employing varied research methods and integrating structural and epistemological considerations can enhance our understanding of entrepreneurial heterogeneity. We advocate for entrepreneurship research that values individual experiences while promoting inclusive practices, highlighting the need for evolving scholarly paradigms to reflect entrepreneurial differences.

Entrepreneurship Theory and PracticeVol. 50(2)
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US), University of Southern California (US), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), St. John's University (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Audencia Business School (FR), Stockholm University (SE), University of Sussex (GB), Aston University (GB), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Georgia State University (US), University of Strathclyde (GB), University of New Orleans (US), Korea University (KR), University of Siegen (DE), Örebro University (SE), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Prince Mohammad Bin Salman College of Business and Entrepreneurship (SA), Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (DE), California State University, San Bernardino (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), University of Greenwich (GB), Syracuse University (US), Old Dominion University (US), Babson College (US), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
11.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.