Processing of grammatical information in cochlear implant simulated speech by German adult listeners

This study investigates how German which-questions are processed in cochlear implant (CI) simulated speech compared to normal speech. In addition, it explores the role of working memory capacity (WM). Using eye-tracking, accuracy and gaze patterns for subject, object and passive questions were studied. Questions were disambiguated with grammatical information, specifically morphosyntactic cues: case and/or subject-verb agreement. Results show that only object question accuracy was affected by CI simulation. Similarly, eye movements showed weaker interpretation preferences for object questions in CI simulation. Participants with high WM had higher accuracy and their eye gaze showed quicker revisions of garden path effects compared to those with medium or low WM capacity. These findings show that morphosyntactic cues support correct interpretation of object questions in CI simulation, but processing these questions is slower and influenced by working memory capacity.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2025-2369
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Processing of grammatical information in cochlear implant simulated speech by German adult listeners

Atty Schouwenaars, Esther Ruigendijk
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Processing of grammatical information in cochlear implant simulated speech by German adult listeners

Atty Schouwenaars, Esther Ruigendijk
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how German which-questions are processed in cochlear implant (CI) simulated speech compared to normal speech. In addition, it explores the role of working memory capacity (WM). Using eye-tracking, accuracy and gaze patterns for subject, object and passive questions were studied. Questions were disambiguated with grammatical information, specifically morphosyntactic cues: case and/or subject-verb agreement. Results show that only object question accuracy was affected by CI simulation. Similarly, eye movements showed weaker interpretation preferences for object questions in CI simulation. Participants with high WM had higher accuracy and their eye gaze showed quicker revisions of garden path effects compared to those with medium or low WM capacity. These findings show that morphosyntactic cues support correct interpretation of object questions in CI simulation, but processing these questions is slower and influenced by working memory capacity.

Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.