Influence of network geometry on long-term morphodynamics of alluvial rivers

Abstract. Alluvial rivers respond to external forcings such as variations in sediment supply, water supply and base level by aggrading, incising and adjusting the rates at which they transport sediment. These processes are recorded by landforms, such as terraces and fans, that develop along river courses, and by stratigraphy in downstream sedimentary basins. Many concepts we use to interpret such records are derived from models that treat alluvial rivers as single-segment streams: for example, the length of an alluvial river has been shown to set its response time to external forcing. However, alluvial rivers in nature exist within interconnected networks, complicating the application of such concepts to real systems. We therefore adapted a model describing long-profile evolution and sediment transport by transport-limited, gravel-bed alluvial rivers to account for network structure, and explored the response of large numbers of synthetic networks to sinusoidally varying sediment and water supply. We show that, in some respects, networks behave similarly to single-segment models. In particular, single-segment models predict well properties that integrate across the entire network, such as the total sediment output. We use this behaviour to define an empirical network response time, and show that this response time scales with network mean length, or the mean distance from all a network's inlets to its outlet. Nevertheless, interactions between segments do lead to complex signal propagation within networks: amplitudes and timings of aggradation and incision vary between minor tributaries and major trunk streams, and between upstream and downstream parts of the network, in ways that depend on each individual network's structure. We conclude that, while single-segment models may be useful for some applications, detailed studies of specific catchments require a modelling framework that accounts for their specific network structure.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Surface Dynamics
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-1059-2025
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of network geometry on long-term morphodynamics of alluvial rivers

Jens Martin Turowski, Fergus McNab, Taylor Schildgen, Andrew D. Wickert
Earth Surface Dynamics
Geological formations and processes
article

Influence of network geometry on long-term morphodynamics of alluvial rivers

Jens Martin Turowski, Fergus McNab, Taylor Schildgen, Andrew D. Wickert
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Alluvial rivers respond to external forcings such as variations in sediment supply, water supply and base level by aggrading, incising and adjusting the rates at which they transport sediment. These processes are recorded by landforms, such as terraces and fans, that develop along river courses, and by stratigraphy in downstream sedimentary basins. Many concepts we use to interpret such records are derived from models that treat alluvial rivers as single-segment streams: for example, the length of an alluvial river has been shown to set its response time to external forcing. However, alluvial rivers in nature exist within interconnected networks, complicating the application of such concepts to real systems. We therefore adapted a model describing long-profile evolution and sediment transport by transport-limited, gravel-bed alluvial rivers to account for network structure, and explored the response of large numbers of synthetic networks to sinusoidally varying sediment and water supply. We show that, in some respects, networks behave similarly to single-segment models. In particular, single-segment models predict well properties that integrate across the entire network, such as the total sediment output. We use this behaviour to define an empirical network response time, and show that this response time scales with network mean length, or the mean distance from all a network's inlets to its outlet. Nevertheless, interactions between segments do lead to complex signal propagation within networks: amplitudes and timings of aggradation and incision vary between minor tributaries and major trunk streams, and between upstream and downstream parts of the network, in ways that depend on each individual network's structure. We conclude that, while single-segment models may be useful for some applications, detailed studies of specific catchments require a modelling framework that accounts for their specific network structure.

Earth Surface DynamicsVol. 13(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geological formations and processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.