Robot-assisted Recognition of Vocal Emotions in Pseudospeech for Cochlear Implanted Adolescents

Recognising vocal emotions in speech is difficult for children with hearing loss and who use a cochlear implant (CI). As regular monitoring could be burdensome, we propose a NAO robot as a test interface. Adolescents with CIs (10-17yr) performed the EmoHI test for recognising vocal emotions in pseudospeech (no linguistic emotion information), once with a computer and once with a NAO. Interfaces are compared via test results and durations, and participants' perception of the interfaces. Test results (sensitivity index, d') were similar (0.36 ± 0.36 vs. 0.37 ± 0.43), but durations were significantly longer on the NAO (4.18 min ± 39 sec vs. 5.13 min ± 51 sec). The computer had a higher perceived usability, but the NAO was rated more enjoyable, engaging and preferable. Overall, the NAO sound quality seems sufficient for conducting the EmoHI test, even with a CI. The higher ratings of enjoyability for NAO may be especially useful in conducting such tests in populations with hearing devices.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2025-2448
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robot-assisted Recognition of Vocal Emotions in Pseudospeech for Cochlear Implanted Adolescents

Deniz Başkent, Gloria Araiza-Illan, Luke Meyer, Bert Maat
Speech and Audio Processing
article

Robot-assisted Recognition of Vocal Emotions in Pseudospeech for Cochlear Implanted Adolescents

Deniz Başkent, Gloria Araiza-Illan, Luke Meyer, Bert Maat
article en

Abstract

Recognising vocal emotions in speech is difficult for children with hearing loss and who use a cochlear implant (CI). As regular monitoring could be burdensome, we propose a NAO robot as a test interface. Adolescents with CIs (10-17yr) performed the EmoHI test for recognising vocal emotions in pseudospeech (no linguistic emotion information), once with a computer and once with a NAO. Interfaces are compared via test results and durations, and participants' perception of the interfaces. Test results (sensitivity index, d') were similar (0.36 ± 0.36 vs. 0.37 ± 0.43), but durations were significantly longer on the NAO (4.18 min ± 39 sec vs. 5.13 min ± 51 sec). The computer had a higher perceived usability, but the NAO was rated more enjoyable, engaging and preferable. Overall, the NAO sound quality seems sufficient for conducting the EmoHI test, even with a CI. The higher ratings of enjoyability for NAO may be especially useful in conducting such tests in populations with hearing devices.

Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.