Uropathogenic Microorganisms After Pelvic Floor Surgery and Mid-Urethral Sling Application: Detection Under Different Culture Conditions

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a prevalent condition that significantly affects quality of life and healthcare systems. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is often treated with mid-urethral sling (MUS), a procedure associated with a risk of postoperative urinary tract infections. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) for detecting uropathogens after MUS compared to conventional culture techniques. In total, 104 women of reproductive age and postmenopausal status were included. Thirty-five women with UI underwent MUS (cases), while 69 undergoing other pelvic floor reconstructions served as controls. Catheterized urine samples were collected preoperatively for both groups and postoperatively only for cases, yielding a total of 139 samples. Each sample was cultured using both conventional and EQUC methods. EQUC detected 66.6% (12 vs. 8 positives) more uropathogens than conventional culture. McNemar's exact test on paired results showed that this difference was not statistically significant in the two-sided test (p = 0.125), but the one-sided test suggested a trend toward higher sensitivity of EQUC (p = 0.063). Notably, no pathogens identified by conventional culture were missed by EQUC, supporting its potential as a more comprehensive diagnostic technique. Key uropathogens identified included <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>. The antibiotic sensitivity profiles reveal variable resistance patterns in detected uropathogens, especially in <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, highlighting the importance of targeted antibiotic therapies for MUS cases. Although limited by sample size and single-center design, these findings indicate a promising but not statistically significant trend, which suggests that EQUC may provide clinically meaningful advantages over standard culture. Adoption of EQUC in postoperative urinary diagnostics could improve pathogen detection, enable more targeted antibiotic therapy, and reduce complications in women undergoing MUS procedures. Our results warrant validation in larger, multicenter studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.95145
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uropathogenic Microorganisms After Pelvic Floor Surgery and Mid-Urethral Sling Application: Detection Under Different Culture Conditions

Dimitrios Balaouras, Iakovos Theodoulidis, P. Ioannidis, Georgios Balaouras et al.
Cureus
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Uropathogenic Microorganisms After Pelvic Floor Surgery and Mid-Urethral Sling Application: Detection Under Different Culture Conditions

Dimitrios Balaouras, Iakovos Theodoulidis, P. Ioannidis, Georgios Balaouras, Artemis Kolynou, Polychronis Kostoulas, Dimitrios Chitzios, Miranda Paraskeva, Themistoklis Mikos, Olympia Lioupi, Vassiliki Koulourida, Eleni Siskou
article en

Abstract

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a prevalent condition that significantly affects quality of life and healthcare systems. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is often treated with mid-urethral sling (MUS), a procedure associated with a risk of postoperative urinary tract infections. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC) for detecting uropathogens after MUS compared to conventional culture techniques. In total, 104 women of reproductive age and postmenopausal status were included. Thirty-five women with UI underwent MUS (cases), while 69 undergoing other pelvic floor reconstructions served as controls. Catheterized urine samples were collected preoperatively for both groups and postoperatively only for cases, yielding a total of 139 samples. Each sample was cultured using both conventional and EQUC methods. EQUC detected 66.6% (12 vs. 8 positives) more uropathogens than conventional culture. McNemar's exact test on paired results showed that this difference was not statistically significant in the two-sided test (p = 0.125), but the one-sided test suggested a trend toward higher sensitivity of EQUC (p = 0.063). Notably, no pathogens identified by conventional culture were missed by EQUC, supporting its potential as a more comprehensive diagnostic technique. Key uropathogens identified included <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, <i>Enterobacter cloacae</i>, and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>. The antibiotic sensitivity profiles reveal variable resistance patterns in detected uropathogens, especially in <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, highlighting the importance of targeted antibiotic therapies for MUS cases. Although limited by sample size and single-center design, these findings indicate a promising but not statistically significant trend, which suggests that EQUC may provide clinically meaningful advantages over standard culture. Adoption of EQUC in postoperative urinary diagnostics could improve pathogen detection, enable more targeted antibiotic therapy, and reduce complications in women undergoing MUS procedures. Our results warrant validation in larger, multicenter studies.

CureusVol. 17(10)
University of Thessaly (GR), International Hellenic University (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Papageorgiou General Hospital (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.