Plasma-Assisted Hydrocarbon Reforming: Effect of Carrier Gas on Product Distribution

This study explores the impact of different carrier gases, such as methane (CH4), propane (C3H8), and argon (Ar), on product distribution in the plasma reforming of liquid fuels (C16H32) in a multiphase medium. Each carrier gas was introduced to the plasma reactor in a 90 to 10 ratio with hydrogen (H2), and the resulting gas and liquid phase products, as well as solid byproducts, were examined. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry revealed that the use of CH4 and C3H8 produced comparable amounts of lighter hydrocarbon components (C9–C15), and it greatly outperformed the product yields seen with Ar. The enhanced conversion of C16H32 in CH4 and C3H8 environments is associated with the formation of reactive radicals (e.g., CH3•, C2H5•) from the carrier gases that directly participate in larger hydrocarbon fragmentation, a process absent when using Ar. Despite similar hydrogen yields in all cases, gas-phase products revealed that C3H8 produced more ethylene (C2H4), ethane (C2H6), propylene (C3H6), and hydrocarbons in the C4–C9 range than CH4 and Ar. Acetylene (C2H2) generation was significantly lower in the C3H8 case, indicating that plasma reactions involving propane favor the formation of stable hydrocarbons and the growth of secondary products over severe fragmentation. Analysis of solid byproducts shows that C3H8 generated the most amount of carbon soot because of the higher C to H ratio among all three carrier gas conditions. These findings show the critical importance of carrier gas chemistry in controlling the distribution of products in plasma multiphase reforming and offer new insights into enhancing plasma-assisted hydrocarbon reforming processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c07801
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma-Assisted Hydrocarbon Reforming: Effect of Carrier Gas on Product Distribution

Howard Jemison, David Staack, Kunpeng Wang, Md Abdullah Hil Baky et al.
1 citations
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
0.75
article

Plasma-Assisted Hydrocarbon Reforming: Effect of Carrier Gas on Product Distribution

Howard Jemison, David Staack, Kunpeng Wang, Md Abdullah Hil Baky, J.-M. Léger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explores the impact of different carrier gases, such as methane (CH4), propane (C3H8), and argon (Ar), on product distribution in the plasma reforming of liquid fuels (C16H32) in a multiphase medium. Each carrier gas was introduced to the plasma reactor in a 90 to 10 ratio with hydrogen (H2), and the resulting gas and liquid phase products, as well as solid byproducts, were examined. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry revealed that the use of CH4 and C3H8 produced comparable amounts of lighter hydrocarbon components (C9–C15), and it greatly outperformed the product yields seen with Ar. The enhanced conversion of C16H32 in CH4 and C3H8 environments is associated with the formation of reactive radicals (e.g., CH3•, C2H5•) from the carrier gases that directly participate in larger hydrocarbon fragmentation, a process absent when using Ar. Despite similar hydrogen yields in all cases, gas-phase products revealed that C3H8 produced more ethylene (C2H4), ethane (C2H6), propylene (C3H6), and hydrocarbons in the C4–C9 range than CH4 and Ar. Acetylene (C2H2) generation was significantly lower in the C3H8 case, indicating that plasma reactions involving propane favor the formation of stable hydrocarbons and the growth of secondary products over severe fragmentation. Analysis of solid byproducts shows that C3H8 generated the most amount of carbon soot because of the higher C to H ratio among all three carrier gas conditions. These findings show the critical importance of carrier gas chemistry in controlling the distribution of products in plasma multiphase reforming and offer new insights into enhancing plasma-assisted hydrocarbon reforming processes.

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringVol. 13(43)
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.