Assembly of skin microbiomes is more neutral than gut microbiomes in multiple animal species

The gut and external tissues of most animals are colonized by communities of microorganisms that can influence the health, development, and fitness of the host. The composition of these communities can vary greatly between individuals within a host species, and both selective factors (e.g., host immune response) and neutral processes (e.g., random loss of microbial cells) have been shown to contribute to this variation. Although it is known that microbiome composition differs between tissues within an individual host, less is known about the ecological processes that underlie these differences. To address this, we investigated whether the contribution of neutral ecological processes to microbiome assembly differs between external (skin and scale) and internal (gut) host tissues for a diverse panel of animal hosts. To do this, we fit a neutral ecological model to microbial communities from external and internal tissues across a variety of animal hosts. Strikingly, we discovered that the neutral model was equally or a better fit to skin or scale microbial communities across all hosts, suggesting that neutral processes play a larger role in the assembly of skin or scale microbiomes compared with gut microbiomes. Furthermore, we observed that this trend is robust to different definitions of the metacommunity (i.e., the microbial taxa available to colonize a host). Finally, we leveraged a simulation framework to compare the model fits of empirical versus simulated microbial communities. We found that neutral model fits to empirical communities can differ from simulated communities, emphasizing the importance of temporal sampling in profiling animal microbiomes.IMPORTANCEAnimal microbiomes are complex assemblages of microorganisms that influence a wide variety of host phenotypes. Despite their importance, we lack a thorough understanding of the processes that guide the formation of microbiomes (i.e., microbiome assembly). Understanding how microbiomes assemble is essential to managing microbiomes for host health, conservation, and other goals. Our work highlights the relatively underappreciated role of neutral ecological processes (the random loss or gain of microbial cells) in the assembly of animal microbiomes. We document a potentially general trend: the microbiomes of external tissues (i.e., skin or scales) tend to be more neutrally assembled than those of internal tissues (i.e., guts). This observation suggests that the commonly reported differences in microbiome composition of external and internal animal tissues may be due in part to different assembly processes. Our work also highlights the dynamic nature of microbiomes and the importance of longitudinal sampling when studying animal microbiomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02223-25
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assembly of skin microbiomes is more neutral than gut microbiomes in multiple animal species

Brendan J. M. Bohannan, Killian D. Campbell, Karen L. Adair
Microbiology Spectrum
Gut microbiota and health
article

Assembly of skin microbiomes is more neutral than gut microbiomes in multiple animal species

Brendan J. M. Bohannan, Killian D. Campbell, Karen L. Adair
article en

Abstract

The gut and external tissues of most animals are colonized by communities of microorganisms that can influence the health, development, and fitness of the host. The composition of these communities can vary greatly between individuals within a host species, and both selective factors (e.g., host immune response) and neutral processes (e.g., random loss of microbial cells) have been shown to contribute to this variation. Although it is known that microbiome composition differs between tissues within an individual host, less is known about the ecological processes that underlie these differences. To address this, we investigated whether the contribution of neutral ecological processes to microbiome assembly differs between external (skin and scale) and internal (gut) host tissues for a diverse panel of animal hosts. To do this, we fit a neutral ecological model to microbial communities from external and internal tissues across a variety of animal hosts. Strikingly, we discovered that the neutral model was equally or a better fit to skin or scale microbial communities across all hosts, suggesting that neutral processes play a larger role in the assembly of skin or scale microbiomes compared with gut microbiomes. Furthermore, we observed that this trend is robust to different definitions of the metacommunity (i.e., the microbial taxa available to colonize a host). Finally, we leveraged a simulation framework to compare the model fits of empirical versus simulated microbial communities. We found that neutral model fits to empirical communities can differ from simulated communities, emphasizing the importance of temporal sampling in profiling animal microbiomes.IMPORTANCEAnimal microbiomes are complex assemblages of microorganisms that influence a wide variety of host phenotypes. Despite their importance, we lack a thorough understanding of the processes that guide the formation of microbiomes (i.e., microbiome assembly). Understanding how microbiomes assemble is essential to managing microbiomes for host health, conservation, and other goals. Our work highlights the relatively underappreciated role of neutral ecological processes (the random loss or gain of microbial cells) in the assembly of animal microbiomes. We document a potentially general trend: the microbiomes of external tissues (i.e., skin or scales) tend to be more neutrally assembled than those of internal tissues (i.e., guts). This observation suggests that the commonly reported differences in microbiome composition of external and internal animal tissues may be due in part to different assembly processes. Our work also highlights the dynamic nature of microbiomes and the importance of longitudinal sampling when studying animal microbiomes.

Microbiology SpectrumVol. 13(12)
University of Oregon (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.