Technical problems and complications following venous port system implantation: a pilot randomized study

Objective. To study the incidence of intraoperative adverse events and complications associated with different vascular access points for venous port system implantation. Material and methods. We included 158 patients divided into three groups depending on access site for port system placement (v. basilica, v. axillaris and v. jugularis interna). We assessed intraoperative adverse events, early complications within 30 days after implantation and delayed events (after 30 days). Results. Guide wire migration was significantly more common in the v. basilica and v. axillaris groups compared to the v. jugularis interna group (12, 15, and 4 instances, respectively; p=0.015). Vascular access challenges were more frequent in the v. axillaris group (p=0.021). The incidence of periprocedural arrhythmias was similar in all groups (p=0.994). There were 19 late complications, including port site infections, skin erosion at the implantation site, catheter thrombosis, pericatheter vascular thrombosis, catheter kinking with loops and extravasation. There was no significant between-group difference (p=0.935). Conclusion. Guide wire migration and difficulties in its positioning were more common in the v. basilica and v. axillaris groups. Catheterization of the v. axillaris often presents technical challenges due to deeper location. However, there is no impact on the overall complication rate. None implantation method showed superiority regarding early or late complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202505181
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical problems and complications following venous port system implantation: a pilot randomized study

Valerii V. Subbotin, A. A. Klimov, A.A. Malakhova, I.N. Izmailov et al.
Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Technical problems and complications following venous port system implantation: a pilot randomized study

Valerii V. Subbotin, A. A. Klimov, A.A. Malakhova, I.N. Izmailov, O.I. Nekrasov, S.O. Trofimov, D.V. Chekmarev
article en

Abstract

Objective. To study the incidence of intraoperative adverse events and complications associated with different vascular access points for venous port system implantation. Material and methods. We included 158 patients divided into three groups depending on access site for port system placement (v. basilica, v. axillaris and v. jugularis interna). We assessed intraoperative adverse events, early complications within 30 days after implantation and delayed events (after 30 days). Results. Guide wire migration was significantly more common in the v. basilica and v. axillaris groups compared to the v. jugularis interna group (12, 15, and 4 instances, respectively; p=0.015). Vascular access challenges were more frequent in the v. axillaris group (p=0.021). The incidence of periprocedural arrhythmias was similar in all groups (p=0.994). There were 19 late complications, including port site infections, skin erosion at the implantation site, catheter thrombosis, pericatheter vascular thrombosis, catheter kinking with loops and extravasation. There was no significant between-group difference (p=0.935). Conclusion. Guide wire migration and difficulties in its positioning were more common in the v. basilica and v. axillaris groups. Catheterization of the v. axillaris often presents technical challenges due to deeper location. However, there is no impact on the overall complication rate. None implantation method showed superiority regarding early or late complications.

Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology(5)
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.