Long-term Survival of the TOEFIT Plus First-Metatarsophalangeal Joint Replacement for End-Stage Hallux Rigidus

Mean Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire score at the latest follow-up telephone consultation was 7.4 (range 0-59, SD 14). Twelve of 70 joints were revised to arthrodesis because of phalangeal component loosening, with 24 joints lost to follow-up. Best-case scenario showed 81% survival at mean 11.0 years, whereas worst-case scenario showed only 48.2% survival. The mean age of patients who had revision surgery was 62.5 years (range 51-73, SD 6.9). The mean age for nonrevised patients was 62.0 years (range 42-82, SD 9.0), with no significant correlation between patients' age and the implant longevity or revision. In the first 5 years following TJR, there was a 15% chance of revision.ConclusionRevision was mainly caused by phalangeal component loosening. Even in the best-case scenario, the 19% revision rate at 10 years is concerning, but the potential 52% failure rate in worst-case analysis is unacceptably high. We recommend discontinuing the use of the ToeFit Plus arthroplasty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle International
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251372891
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term Survival of the TOEFIT Plus First-Metatarsophalangeal Joint Replacement for End-Stage Hallux Rigidus

Rohan Rajan, Vishal Upadhyay, Jyoti Shrestha, Islam Sarhan et al.
Foot & Ankle International
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Long-term Survival of the TOEFIT Plus First-Metatarsophalangeal Joint Replacement for End-Stage Hallux Rigidus

Rohan Rajan, Vishal Upadhyay, Jyoti Shrestha, Islam Sarhan, Daniel Ananda-Rajan
article en

Abstract

Mean Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire score at the latest follow-up telephone consultation was 7.4 (range 0-59, SD 14). Twelve of 70 joints were revised to arthrodesis because of phalangeal component loosening, with 24 joints lost to follow-up. Best-case scenario showed 81% survival at mean 11.0 years, whereas worst-case scenario showed only 48.2% survival. The mean age of patients who had revision surgery was 62.5 years (range 51-73, SD 6.9). The mean age for nonrevised patients was 62.0 years (range 42-82, SD 9.0), with no significant correlation between patients' age and the implant longevity or revision. In the first 5 years following TJR, there was a 15% chance of revision.ConclusionRevision was mainly caused by phalangeal component loosening. Even in the best-case scenario, the 19% revision rate at 10 years is concerning, but the potential 52% failure rate in worst-case analysis is unacceptably high. We recommend discontinuing the use of the ToeFit Plus arthroplasty.

Foot & Ankle InternationalVol. 46(12)
University of Derby (GB), University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Alexandria University (EG), University of Plymouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Long-term Survival of the TOEFIT Plus First-Metatarsophalangeal Joint Replacement for End-Stage Hallux Rigidus — Rohan Rajan, Vishal Upadhyay, et al. · Foot & Ankle International (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS