When Consumers Smell a Sell in Personal Stories: How Influencer Narratives Backfire and the Role of Sponsorship Disclosures

The rapid growth of social media has prompted many corporations to collaborate with social media influencers (SMIs) to create sponsored personal stories to engage their consumers. While the positive effects of narrative transportation have been examined in the SMI context, its potential backfire effects are rarely explored. Through two online experiments, Study 1 ( N = 161) found that narratives (vs. non-narratives) resulted in less positive ad responses, with these effects fully mediated by perceived manipulative intent. Study 2 ( N = 257) replicated these findings and further revealed that sponsorship disclosure moderated these effects: disclosure exacerbates the backfire effects of narratives by heightening perceived manipulative intent, whereas in non-narrative ads, it enhances ad effects by reducing consumers’ inference of manipulative intent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251378661
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Consumers Smell a Sell in Personal Stories: How Influencer Narratives Backfire and the Role of Sponsorship Disclosures

J. Li, Erich J. Sommerfeldt, Yanni Ma
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

When Consumers Smell a Sell in Personal Stories: How Influencer Narratives Backfire and the Role of Sponsorship Disclosures

J. Li, Erich J. Sommerfeldt, Yanni Ma
article en

Abstract

The rapid growth of social media has prompted many corporations to collaborate with social media influencers (SMIs) to create sponsored personal stories to engage their consumers. While the positive effects of narrative transportation have been examined in the SMI context, its potential backfire effects are rarely explored. Through two online experiments, Study 1 ( N = 161) found that narratives (vs. non-narratives) resulted in less positive ad responses, with these effects fully mediated by perceived manipulative intent. Study 2 ( N = 257) replicated these findings and further revealed that sponsorship disclosure moderated these effects: disclosure exacerbates the backfire effects of narratives by heightening perceived manipulative intent, whereas in non-narrative ads, it enhances ad effects by reducing consumers’ inference of manipulative intent.

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
University of Minnesota (US), Oregon State University (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.