Artificial intelligence driven intraocular lens power calculation in extreme axial myopia

Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is critical in cataract surgery, especially in patients with extreme axial myopia where traditional formulas often yield inaccurate results. This study retrospectively evaluated the accuracy of two AI-driven IOL formulas (Hill-RBF, Kane), the Barrett Universal II formula, and the traditional SRK/T formula in patients with axial lengths ≥ 30.0 mm. Data from 80 eyes of 51 patients treated at the Institute of Science Tokyo were analyzed. Postoperative refractive errors were recalculated, and accuracy was assessed using mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and median absolute error (MedAE). Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and chi-square test. The Kane and Hill-RBF formulas demonstrated significantly lower MAE (0.51 D and 0.52 D, respectively) compared to SRK/T (P < 0.05). MAE of the Barrett Universal II formula was 0.66D, which was not significantly different from SRK/T. In eyes with axial lengths ≥ 32.0 mm, Kane achieved the lowest MAE and MedAE (0.44 D and 0.40 D). Both Kane and Hill-RBF showed lower refractive errors > ± 1.0 D (7.5%) compared to SRK/T (42.5%). AI-driven formulas, particularly Kane and Hill-RBF, significantly improve refractive accuracy in extreme axial myopia. Their clinical adoption may enhance postoperative visual outcomes and reduce the need for corrective interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20899-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence driven intraocular lens power calculation in extreme axial myopia

Kengo Uramoto, Kyoko Ohno‐Matsui, Yudai Suzuki, Koju Kamoi
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
1.35
article

Artificial intelligence driven intraocular lens power calculation in extreme axial myopia

Kengo Uramoto, Kyoko Ohno‐Matsui, Yudai Suzuki, Koju Kamoi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is critical in cataract surgery, especially in patients with extreme axial myopia where traditional formulas often yield inaccurate results. This study retrospectively evaluated the accuracy of two AI-driven IOL formulas (Hill-RBF, Kane), the Barrett Universal II formula, and the traditional SRK/T formula in patients with axial lengths ≥ 30.0 mm. Data from 80 eyes of 51 patients treated at the Institute of Science Tokyo were analyzed. Postoperative refractive errors were recalculated, and accuracy was assessed using mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and median absolute error (MedAE). Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and chi-square test. The Kane and Hill-RBF formulas demonstrated significantly lower MAE (0.51 D and 0.52 D, respectively) compared to SRK/T (P < 0.05). MAE of the Barrett Universal II formula was 0.66D, which was not significantly different from SRK/T. In eyes with axial lengths ≥ 32.0 mm, Kane achieved the lowest MAE and MedAE (0.44 D and 0.40 D). Both Kane and Hill-RBF showed lower refractive errors > ± 1.0 D (7.5%) compared to SRK/T (42.5%). AI-driven formulas, particularly Kane and Hill-RBF, significantly improve refractive accuracy in extreme axial myopia. Their clinical adoption may enhance postoperative visual outcomes and reduce the need for corrective interventions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), Noguchi Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.