Comparative Study on the Low‐Velocity Impact Performance in Basalt Fiber and Flax Fiber Reinforced Composite Laminates

ABSTRACT Basalt and flax fiber reinforced composites are attracting increasing interest for their natural origin, lightweight properties, and sustainability potential. Yet, their low‐velocity impact behavior and failure mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. This study systematically compares the impact performance of basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) and flax fiber reinforced polymer (FFRP) laminates through combined experimental and numerical approaches. Drop‐weight impact tests with high‐speed imaging captured dynamic responses and real‐time damage evolution. At 30 J, BFRP reached a peak force of 5.0 kN—3.8 times that of FFRP—while FFRP achieved a maximum displacement of 30.2 mm, over twice that of BFRP. Numerical simulations reproduced force–displacement responses and crack morphologies with good accuracy, confirming the predictive reliability of the model. Results show that BFRP exhibits high stiffness and penetration resistance but fails through brittle fracture, whereas FFRP dissipates energy via progressive delamination and matrix cracking facilitated by its hierarchical fiber structure and weak interfaces. These findings elucidate the intrinsic strength–toughness trade‐off between mineral‐ and plant‐based composites and provide a useful framework for designing impact‐resistant sustainable laminates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.70582
Primary Topic
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on the Low‐Velocity Impact Performance in Basalt Fiber and Flax Fiber Reinforced Composite Laminates

Xun Huang, Krishnan Jayaraman, Wenjie Wang, Nam Kyeun Kim et al.
Polymer Composites
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
article

Comparative Study on the Low‐Velocity Impact Performance in Basalt Fiber and Flax Fiber Reinforced Composite Laminates

Xun Huang, Krishnan Jayaraman, Wenjie Wang, Nam Kyeun Kim, Zhipeng Wang, Jianxun Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Basalt and flax fiber reinforced composites are attracting increasing interest for their natural origin, lightweight properties, and sustainability potential. Yet, their low‐velocity impact behavior and failure mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. This study systematically compares the impact performance of basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) and flax fiber reinforced polymer (FFRP) laminates through combined experimental and numerical approaches. Drop‐weight impact tests with high‐speed imaging captured dynamic responses and real‐time damage evolution. At 30 J, BFRP reached a peak force of 5.0 kN—3.8 times that of FFRP—while FFRP achieved a maximum displacement of 30.2 mm, over twice that of BFRP. Numerical simulations reproduced force–displacement responses and crack morphologies with good accuracy, confirming the predictive reliability of the model. Results show that BFRP exhibits high stiffness and penetration resistance but fails through brittle fracture, whereas FFRP dissipates energy via progressive delamination and matrix cracking facilitated by its hierarchical fiber structure and weak interfaces. These findings elucidate the intrinsic strength–toughness trade‐off between mineral‐ and plant‐based composites and provide a useful framework for designing impact‐resistant sustainable laminates.

Polymer Composites
University of Auckland (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.