A comparative Bayesian PINN–MCMC analysis of Barrow–Tsallis holographic dark energy with neutrinos: Toward resolving the Hubble tension

We present a comprehensive analysis of the Barrow–Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy (BTHDE) model within a spatially flat FLRW cosmology, focusing on a comparative assessment between traditional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods and a Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN). By embedding the modified Friedmann dynamics directly into the learning architecture, the Bayesian PINN framework enforces physical consistency while enabling efficient posterior sampling. We employ a broad suite of cosmological observations, including Planck 2018 CMB temperature and polarization data, CMB lensing, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), Cosmic Chronometers (CC), and the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernovae compilation, to jointly constrain the Hubble constant H 0 , the Tsallis nonextensive parameter q , Barrow exponent Δ, Granda–Oliveros cutoff parameters α and β , and the total neutrino mass Σ m ν . In the late-time (CC + Pantheon+) analyses, we adopt flat, physically motivated priors on the baryon and cold dark matter densities ( Ω b h 2 and Ω c h 2 ) solely for the internal calibration of the sound horizon r d , without employing any Planck-based or early-universe likelihoods. The Bayesian PINN consistently yields sharper posterior distributions than MCMC, particularly for H 0 and Σ m ν , while ensuring solution smoothness and dynamical compatibility. Both methods place the inferred H 0 values between the Planck and SH 0 ES estimates, lowering the Hubble tension to the 1.3 σ –2.1 σ range. In the MCMC framework, combined CMB and low-redshift datasets constrain Σ m ν < 0.114 eV and H 0 = 70.6 ± 1.35 km/s/Mpc . Our results demonstrate the viability of the BTHDE model as a compelling alternative to ΛCDM and highlight the complementary strengths of Bayesian PINNs and MCMC in probing extended dark energy scenarios governed by generalized entropy frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High Energy Astrophysics
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100498
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative Bayesian PINN–MCMC analysis of Barrow–Tsallis holographic dark energy with neutrinos: Toward resolving the Hubble tension

Muhammad Yarahmadi, Amin Salehi
1 citations
Journal of High Energy Astrophysics
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
1.15
article

A comparative Bayesian PINN–MCMC analysis of Barrow–Tsallis holographic dark energy with neutrinos: Toward resolving the Hubble tension

Muhammad Yarahmadi, Amin Salehi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We present a comprehensive analysis of the Barrow–Tsallis Holographic Dark Energy (BTHDE) model within a spatially flat FLRW cosmology, focusing on a comparative assessment between traditional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods and a Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN). By embedding the modified Friedmann dynamics directly into the learning architecture, the Bayesian PINN framework enforces physical consistency while enabling efficient posterior sampling. We employ a broad suite of cosmological observations, including Planck 2018 CMB temperature and polarization data, CMB lensing, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), Cosmic Chronometers (CC), and the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernovae compilation, to jointly constrain the Hubble constant H 0 , the Tsallis nonextensive parameter q , Barrow exponent Δ, Granda–Oliveros cutoff parameters α and β , and the total neutrino mass Σ m ν . In the late-time (CC + Pantheon+) analyses, we adopt flat, physically motivated priors on the baryon and cold dark matter densities ( Ω b h 2 and Ω c h 2 ) solely for the internal calibration of the sound horizon r d , without employing any Planck-based or early-universe likelihoods. The Bayesian PINN consistently yields sharper posterior distributions than MCMC, particularly for H 0 and Σ m ν , while ensuring solution smoothness and dynamical compatibility. Both methods place the inferred H 0 values between the Planck and SH 0 ES estimates, lowering the Hubble tension to the 1.3 σ –2.1 σ range. In the MCMC framework, combined CMB and low-redshift datasets constrain Σ m ν < 0.114 eV and H 0 = 70.6 ± 1.35 km/s/Mpc . Our results demonstrate the viability of the BTHDE model as a compelling alternative to ΛCDM and highlight the complementary strengths of Bayesian PINNs and MCMC in probing extended dark energy scenarios governed by generalized entropy frameworks.

Journal of High Energy AstrophysicsVol. 50
Lorestan University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative Bayesian PINN–MCMC analysis of Barrow–Tsallis holographic dark energy with neutrinos: Toward resolving the Hubble tension — Muhammad Yarahmadi, Amin Salehi · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS