Enhancing condensation heat transfer and water harvesting using nanostructured copper surfaces

• SHPB copper reached the highest hD (17,841 W/m 2 .K) via dropwise condensation. • SHPL surfaces collected 1.46 g/h, >65 % more condensate than other surfaces. • SHPL maintained performance after 310 h; SHPB coatings showed degradation. • A 243 mm tube gave the best thermal performance for all surface types. • Clear trade-off: SHPB boosts heat transfer, SHPL ensures durability and water yield. Droplet surface interactions critically influence condensation heat transfer and water harvesting. On hydrophilic surfaces, liquid films increase thermal resistance, whereas on hydrophobic surfaces, dropwise condensation can enhance heat transfer but is sensitive to wetting-state changes. This study evaluates the heat transfer performance, droplet collection efficiency, and long-term durability of bare copper tubes, nanostructured superhydrophilic (SHPL) surfaces fabricated by NaOH-(NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 etching, and superhydrophobic (SHPB) surfaces obtained by PDMS coating. Condensation experiments were performed using a thermoelectric cooler (TEC) and a cooling water-in-tube setup for droplet collection, and a shell-and-tube heat exchanger for heat transfer testing. Consistent results from both setups showed that SHPB surfaces exhibited the highest heat transfer coefficient (hD ≈ 17,841.13 W/m 2 .K) and largest temperature difference (ΔT = 11.7 °C), whereas SHPL surfaces recorded the lowest hD (≈ 2,930.20 W/m 2 .K) and ΔT (10.8 °C). In water harvesting, SHPL surfaces outperformed other samples with an average condensate collection rate of 1.46 g/h, compared to 0.74 g/h for SHPB and 0.87 g/h for bare copper. After 310.24 h of operation, SHPL retained its superhydrophilicity with no measurable contact angle, while SHPB showed partial degradation due to dust and residue accumulation. These findings highlight a trade-off between heat transfer efficiency, droplet collection, and surface stability, and point to the need for hybrid or patterned surfaces to combine the advantages of both wetting states in future applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107873
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing condensation heat transfer and water harvesting using nanostructured copper surfaces

Wawan Septiawan Damanik, Poetro Lebdo Sambegoro, Tubagus Ahmad Fauzi Soelaiman, Johan Samuel Tjandrawinata
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
0.66
article

Enhancing condensation heat transfer and water harvesting using nanostructured copper surfaces

Wawan Septiawan Damanik, Poetro Lebdo Sambegoro, Tubagus Ahmad Fauzi Soelaiman, Johan Samuel Tjandrawinata
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• SHPB copper reached the highest hD (17,841 W/m 2 .K) via dropwise condensation. • SHPL surfaces collected 1.46 g/h, >65 % more condensate than other surfaces. • SHPL maintained performance after 310 h; SHPB coatings showed degradation. • A 243 mm tube gave the best thermal performance for all surface types. • Clear trade-off: SHPB boosts heat transfer, SHPL ensures durability and water yield. Droplet surface interactions critically influence condensation heat transfer and water harvesting. On hydrophilic surfaces, liquid films increase thermal resistance, whereas on hydrophobic surfaces, dropwise condensation can enhance heat transfer but is sensitive to wetting-state changes. This study evaluates the heat transfer performance, droplet collection efficiency, and long-term durability of bare copper tubes, nanostructured superhydrophilic (SHPL) surfaces fabricated by NaOH-(NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 etching, and superhydrophobic (SHPB) surfaces obtained by PDMS coating. Condensation experiments were performed using a thermoelectric cooler (TEC) and a cooling water-in-tube setup for droplet collection, and a shell-and-tube heat exchanger for heat transfer testing. Consistent results from both setups showed that SHPB surfaces exhibited the highest heat transfer coefficient (hD ≈ 17,841.13 W/m 2 .K) and largest temperature difference (ΔT = 11.7 °C), whereas SHPL surfaces recorded the lowest hD (≈ 2,930.20 W/m 2 .K) and ΔT (10.8 °C). In water harvesting, SHPL surfaces outperformed other samples with an average condensate collection rate of 1.46 g/h, compared to 0.74 g/h for SHPB and 0.87 g/h for bare copper. After 310.24 h of operation, SHPL retained its superhydrophilicity with no measurable contact angle, while SHPB showed partial degradation due to dust and residue accumulation. These findings highlight a trade-off between heat transfer efficiency, droplet collection, and surface stability, and point to the need for hybrid or patterned surfaces to combine the advantages of both wetting states in future applications.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Bandung Institute of Technology (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.