Lumbar stabilization exercise with and without real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

Reduced lumbar multifidus (LM) cross-sectional area (CSA) has been linked with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP); hence, lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) is typically used as treatment. Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) biofeedback can enhance performance and retention in LM activation. This study aimed to compare the effects of LSE with or without RUSI-biofeedback in patients with NCLBP. A single-blind, three-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial involving 90 participants, randomized into LSERUSI-biofeedback, LSEno-biofeedback, or minimal intervention (n = 30 per group) was conducted. All interventions were administered twice weekly for 8 weeks, and outcomes (LM-CSA, pain, disability, and quality of life) were evaluated before and at 8-week and 20-week follow-ups. Compared to LSEno-biofeedback and minimal intervention, LSERUSI-biofeedback demonstrated a greater increase (p < 0.05) in LM-CSA at 8 weeks (mean [95%CI] difference: 0.81 [0–1.62] and 1.79 [0.91–2.65], respectively) and at 20 weeks (1.61 [0.79–2.42] and 2.66 [1.79–2.53], respectively). LSERUSI-biofeedback showed a greater improvement (p < 0.05) in mental health scores at 8 weeks (3.63 [0.32–6.94]) and 20 weeks (7.34 [4.03–10.60]) compared to LSEno-biofeedback. However, LSEno-biofeedback showed a greater physical health scores at 20 weeks (− 4.89 [− 7.92 to − 1.86]) compared to LSERUSI-biofeedback. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between LSERUSI-biofeedback and LSEno-biofeedback for pain or disability. The increase in LM-CSA significantly correlated with changes in pain (r = − 0.40 to − 0.50, p < 0.05) and disability (r = − 0.38 to − 0.42, p < 0.05). In conclusion, LSE with or without RUSI-biofeedback improved LM-CSA, pain, disability, and quality of life. However, LSERUSI-biofeedback led to a greater increase in LM-CSA. Such an increase appears to be related to changes in pain and disability. Trial registration: The study was registered in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (16/01/2018; PACTR201801002980602).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20942-6
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lumbar stabilization exercise with and without real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

Bashir Bello, Mukadas O. Akindele, Adedapo Wasiu Awotidebe, Aminu A. Ibrahim et al.
Scientific Reports
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Lumbar stabilization exercise with and without real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback in chronic low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

Bashir Bello, Mukadas O. Akindele, Adedapo Wasiu Awotidebe, Aminu A. Ibrahim, Bashir Kaka, Peemongkon Wattananon, Raheem Sarafadeen, Sokunbi Oluwaleke Ganiyu
article en

Abstract

Reduced lumbar multifidus (LM) cross-sectional area (CSA) has been linked with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP); hence, lumbar stabilization exercise (LSE) is typically used as treatment. Real-time ultrasound imaging (RUSI) biofeedback can enhance performance and retention in LM activation. This study aimed to compare the effects of LSE with or without RUSI-biofeedback in patients with NCLBP. A single-blind, three-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial involving 90 participants, randomized into LSERUSI-biofeedback, LSEno-biofeedback, or minimal intervention (n = 30 per group) was conducted. All interventions were administered twice weekly for 8 weeks, and outcomes (LM-CSA, pain, disability, and quality of life) were evaluated before and at 8-week and 20-week follow-ups. Compared to LSEno-biofeedback and minimal intervention, LSERUSI-biofeedback demonstrated a greater increase (p < 0.05) in LM-CSA at 8 weeks (mean [95%CI] difference: 0.81 [0–1.62] and 1.79 [0.91–2.65], respectively) and at 20 weeks (1.61 [0.79–2.42] and 2.66 [1.79–2.53], respectively). LSERUSI-biofeedback showed a greater improvement (p < 0.05) in mental health scores at 8 weeks (3.63 [0.32–6.94]) and 20 weeks (7.34 [4.03–10.60]) compared to LSEno-biofeedback. However, LSEno-biofeedback showed a greater physical health scores at 20 weeks (− 4.89 [− 7.92 to − 1.86]) compared to LSERUSI-biofeedback. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between LSERUSI-biofeedback and LSEno-biofeedback for pain or disability. The increase in LM-CSA significantly correlated with changes in pain (r = − 0.40 to − 0.50, p < 0.05) and disability (r = − 0.38 to − 0.42, p < 0.05). In conclusion, LSE with or without RUSI-biofeedback improved LM-CSA, pain, disability, and quality of life. However, LSERUSI-biofeedback led to a greater increase in LM-CSA. Such an increase appears to be related to changes in pain and disability. Trial registration: The study was registered in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (16/01/2018; PACTR201801002980602).

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Mahidol University (TH), North-West University (ZA), State Hospital (GB), Tishk International University (IQ), Bayero University Kano (NG), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.