Mind the Gap: An Integrative Review of the Causes of the Gender Pay Gap

ABSTRACT The gender pay gap (GPG) is often discussed in policy, media, and across multiple academic literatures. Scholars of the GPG have focused significant attention on the causes and generated an extensive body of work revealing rich insights on why women tend to make less than men. But this literature is fragmented, and the sheer number of causes found in previous studies limits our ability to recognize the main reasons for the gap and move the literature forward toward solutions. We review the literature across fields, including economics, sociology, and applied psychology/management, and offer a unifying framework that identifies the main reasons for the GPG. Specifically, our framework organizes the GPG causes, and the theories used to explain such causes into four main perspectives: capital accumulation, bias and discrimination, sorting, and nature‐ and nurture‐based differences. Our framework also explains how these perspectives are affected by the national and organizational contexts in which they are embedded. We then discuss gaps in the current literature exposed by our model that can be filled via novel theoretical, cross‐disciplinary research, and by adopting different methodological and practical approaches. Overall, our review distills a large and diffuse literature into a clear framework to direct researchers toward theoretical insights and novel research questions that can get us closer to pay equality across genders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70034
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind the Gap: An Integrative Review of the Causes of the Gender Pay Gap

Felice Klein, Beth A. Livingston, Anushka Chakroborty, Sujin Jeong
1 citations
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
3.13
article

Mind the Gap: An Integrative Review of the Causes of the Gender Pay Gap

Felice Klein, Beth A. Livingston, Anushka Chakroborty, Sujin Jeong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The gender pay gap (GPG) is often discussed in policy, media, and across multiple academic literatures. Scholars of the GPG have focused significant attention on the causes and generated an extensive body of work revealing rich insights on why women tend to make less than men. But this literature is fragmented, and the sheer number of causes found in previous studies limits our ability to recognize the main reasons for the gap and move the literature forward toward solutions. We review the literature across fields, including economics, sociology, and applied psychology/management, and offer a unifying framework that identifies the main reasons for the GPG. Specifically, our framework organizes the GPG causes, and the theories used to explain such causes into four main perspectives: capital accumulation, bias and discrimination, sorting, and nature‐ and nurture‐based differences. Our framework also explains how these perspectives are affected by the national and organizational contexts in which they are embedded. We then discuss gaps in the current literature exposed by our model that can be filled via novel theoretical, cross‐disciplinary research, and by adopting different methodological and practical approaches. Overall, our review distills a large and diffuse literature into a clear framework to direct researchers toward theoretical insights and novel research questions that can get us closer to pay equality across genders.

Journal of Organizational BehaviorVol. 47(2)
Boise State University (US), University of Iowa (US), Loyola University Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.